These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11118767)

  • 1. Detection of susceptibility effects using simultaneous T(2)* and magnetic field mapping.
    Bonny JM; Laurent W; Renou JP
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Nov; 18(9):1125-8. PubMed ID: 11118767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain.
    Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z
    J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual-pathway multi-echo sequence for simultaneous frequency and T2 mapping.
    Cheng CC; Mei CS; Duryea J; Chung HW; Chao TC; Panych LP; Madore B
    J Magn Reson; 2016 Apr; 265():177-87. PubMed ID: 26923150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Concepts and Applications.
    Reichenbach JR; Schweser F; Serres B; Deistung A
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Oct; 25 Suppl 2():225-30. PubMed ID: 26198880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved visualization of the human lung in 1H MRI using multiple inversion recovery for simultaneous suppression of signal contributions from fat and muscle.
    Mai VM; Knight-Scott J; Berr SS
    Magn Reson Med; 1999 May; 41(5):866-70. PubMed ID: 10332866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of an adapted MRI pulse sequence for quantification of fatty infiltration in muscle.
    Doro LC; Ladd B; Hughes RE; Chenevert TL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jul; 27(6):823-7. PubMed ID: 19261424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Muscle, adipose, and connective tissue variations in intrinsic musculature of the adult human tongue.
    Miller JL; Watkin KL; Chen MF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 45(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 14748638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The future of susceptibility contrast for assessment of anatomy and function.
    Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(2):1311-5. PubMed ID: 22245644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-resolution in vivo measurements of transverse relaxation times in rats at 7 Tesla.
    Crémillieux Y; Ding S; Dunn JF
    Magn Reson Med; 1998 Feb; 39(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 9469712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonlinear magnitude and linear phase behaviors of T2* imaging: theoretical approximation and Monte Carlo simulation.
    Chen Z; Calhoun V
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 33(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 25623809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic susceptibility shift selected imaging: MESSI.
    Xu Y; Balschi JA; Springer CS
    Magn Reson Med; 1990 Oct; 16(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 2255239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of the spatial organization of the perimysium on beef tenderness.
    Sifre L; Berge P; Engel E; Martin JF; Bonny JM; Listrat A; Taylor R; Culioli J
    J Agric Food Chem; 2005 Oct; 53(21):8390-9. PubMed ID: 16218692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overview of quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Deistung A; Schweser F; Reichenbach JR
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27434134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward in vivo histology: a comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with magnitude-, phase-, and R2*-imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength.
    Deistung A; Schäfer A; Schweser F; Biedermann U; Turner R; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():299-314. PubMed ID: 23036448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiation of normal and pathologic brain structures in MRI using exact T1 and T2 values followed by a multidimensional cluster analysis.
    Bernarding J; Reul J; Tolxdorff T
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():687-91. PubMed ID: 8591300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging of the foot and ankle.
    Terk MR; Kwong PK
    Clin Sports Med; 1994 Oct; 13(4):883-908. PubMed ID: 7805112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic field correlation imaging.
    Jensen JH; Chandra R; Ramani A; Lu H; Johnson G; Lee SP; Kaczynski K; Helpern JA
    Magn Reson Med; 2006 Jun; 55(6):1350-61. PubMed ID: 16700026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MRI-guided gas bubble enhanced ultrasound heating in in vivo rabbit thigh.
    Sokka SD; King R; Hynynen K
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jan; 48(2):223-41. PubMed ID: 12587906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-point water-fat imaging with partially-opposed-phase (POP) acquisition: an asymmetric Dixon method.
    Xiang QS
    Magn Reson Med; 2006 Sep; 56(3):572-84. PubMed ID: 16894578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gaussian approximation in the theory of MR signal formation in the presence of structure-specific magnetic field inhomogeneities. Effects of impermeable susceptibility inclusions.
    Sukstanskii AL; Yablonskiy DA
    J Magn Reson; 2004 Mar; 167(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 14987599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.