These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11120367)
1. Predicting the acoustic response of a microbubble population for contrast imaging in medical ultrasound. Chin CT; Burns PN Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Oct; 26(8):1293-300. PubMed ID: 11120367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interaction of an ultrasound-activated contrast microbubble with a wall at arbitrary separation distances. Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):7909-25. PubMed ID: 26407104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Theoretical predictions of harmonic generation from submicron ultrasound contrast agents for nonlinear biomedical ultrasound imaging. Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Shandas R Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):557-73. PubMed ID: 16424581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Acoustic Parameters and Microbubble Concentration on the Likelihood of Encapsulated Microbubble Coalescence. Le DQ; Papadopoulou V; Dayton PA Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Oct; 47(10):2980-2989. PubMed ID: 34344561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents. de Jong N; Emmer M; van Wamel A; Versluis M Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Aug; 47(8):861-73. PubMed ID: 19468770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The acoustics of diagnostic microbubbles: dissipative effects and heat deposition. Hilgenfeldt S; Lohse D Ultrasonics; 2000 Mar; 38(1-8):99-104. PubMed ID: 10829637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbubble oscillating in a microvessel filled with viscous fluid: A finite element modeling study. Chen C; Gu Y; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D Ultrasonics; 2016 Mar; 66():54-64. PubMed ID: 26651263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resonance frequencies of lipid-shelled microbubbles in the regime of nonlinear oscillations. Doinikov AA; Haac JF; Dayton PA Ultrasonics; 2009 Feb; 49(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 18977009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustic properties of NC100100 and their relation with the microbubble size distribution. Sontum PC; Ostensen J; Dyrstad K; Hoff L Invest Radiol; 1999 Apr; 34(4):268-75. PubMed ID: 10196718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Numerical modeling of microbubble backscatter to optimize ultrasound particle image velocimetry imaging: initial studies. Mukdadi OM; Kim HB; Hertzberg J; Shandas R Ultrasonics; 2004 Aug; 42(10):1111-21. PubMed ID: 15234173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical observations of acoustical radiation force effects on individual air bubbles. Palanchon P; Tortoli P; Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Jan; 52(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 15742566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Basic acoustic properties of microbubbles. de Jong N; Bouakaz A; Frinking P Echocardiography; 2002 Apr; 19(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 12022933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Numerical Study of Bubble Area Evolution During Acoustic Droplet Vaporization-Enhanced HIFU Treatment. Xin Y; Zhang A; Xu LX; Brian Fowlkes J J Biomech Eng; 2017 Sep; 139(9):. PubMed ID: 28654938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonlinear behaviors of contrast agents relevant to diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Wu J; Pepe J; Dewitt W Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Apr; 29(4):555-62. PubMed ID: 12749925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles. Doinikov AA; Haac JF; Dayton PA Ultrasonics; 2009 Feb; 49(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 18990417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Focal areas of increased lipid concentration on the coating of microbubbles during short tone-burst ultrasound insonification. Kooiman K; van Rooij T; Qin B; Mastik F; Vos HJ; Versluis M; Klibanov AL; de Jong N; Villanueva FS; Chen X PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180747. PubMed ID: 28686673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding the limitations of ultrasonic backscatter measurements from microbubble populations. Sboros V; Ramnarine KV; Moran CM; Pye SD; McDicken WN Phys Med Biol; 2002 Dec; 47(23):4287-99. PubMed ID: 12502050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic characterization of monodisperse lipid-coated microbubbles: relationship between size and shell viscoelastic properties. Parrales MA; Fernandez JM; Perez-Saborid M; Kopechek JA; Porter TM J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1077. PubMed ID: 25190383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction. Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 15749563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]