190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11120569)
1. Endothelial cells analysis with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
Cheung SW; Cho P
Curr Eye Res; 2000 Oct; 21(4):788-98. PubMed ID: 11120569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement area and repeatability of semiautomated assessment of corneal endothelium in the Topcon specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
Ding X; Huang Q; Zheng Y; Jiang Y; Huang S; He M
Cornea; 2012 Oct; 31(10):1111-8. PubMed ID: 22902488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P.
Cho P; Cheung SW
Curr Eye Res; 2000 Oct; 21(4):799-807. PubMed ID: 11120570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal endothelium evaluation with 2 noncontact specular microscopes and their semiautomated methods of analysis.
de Sanctis U; Machetta F; Razzano L; Dalmasso P; Grignolo FM
Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 16783136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of endothelial cell analysis methods and recommendations for calibration in Topcon SP-2000P specular microscopy.
van Schaick W; van Dooren BT; Mulder PG; Völker-Dieben HJ
Cornea; 2005 Jul; 24(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 15968157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of semi-automated center-dot and fully automated endothelial cell analyses from specular microscopy images.
Maruoka S; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Katakami C; Tabuchi H; Chikama T; Kiuchi Y
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 38(6):2495-2507. PubMed ID: 29086325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Further analysis of assessments of the coefficient of variation of corneal endothelial cell areas from specular microscopic images.
Doughty MJ; Aakre BM
Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Sep; 91(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 18537989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial morphology using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy, and Confoscan 4 confocal microscopy.
Al Farhan HM; Al Otaibi WM; Al Razqan HM; Al Harqan AA
BMC Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 13():73. PubMed ID: 24274022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Could the coefficient of variation (COV) of the corneal endothelium be overestimated when a centre-dot method is used?
Doughty MJ
Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Jan; 91(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 18045256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of applied corneal endothelium image segmentation techniques on the clinical parameters.
Piorkowski A; Nurzynska K; Gronkowska-Serafin J; Selig B; Boldak C; Reska D
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2017 Jan; 55():13-27. PubMed ID: 27553657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell measurements by Scheimpflug camera system and two noncontact specular microscopes.
Karaca I; Yilmaz SG; Palamar M; Ates H
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1601-1609. PubMed ID: 28674859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurements of central corneal thickness and endothelial parameters with three different non-contact specular microscopy devices.
Cakici O; Karadag R; Bayramlar H; Koyun E
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 37(1):229-233. PubMed ID: 27221264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy.
Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Modak C; Marion K; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL
J Optom; 2018; 11(3):182-191. PubMed ID: 28797649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphometric analysis of the corneal endothelium with three different specular microscopes.
Landesz M; Kamps A; Slart R; Siertsema JV; van Rij G
Doc Ophthalmol; 1995; 90(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 8549239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Corneal thickness measurements with the Topcon SP-2000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter.
Bovelle R; Kaufman SC; Thompson HW; Hamano H
Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Jul; 117(7):868-70. PubMed ID: 10408449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of noncontact pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Maldonado MJ; López-Miguel A; Nieto JC; Cano-Parra J; Calvo B; Alió JL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4135-41. PubMed ID: 19357360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the corneal endothelium using noncontact and contact specular microscopy.
Szalai E; Németh G; Berta A; Módis L
Cornea; 2011 May; 30(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 21598434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep Learning for Assessing the Corneal Endothelium from Specular Microscopy Images up to 1 Year after Ultrathin-DSAEK Surgery.
Vigueras-Guillén JP; van Rooij J; Engel A; Lemij HG; van Vliet LJ; Vermeer KA
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Aug; 9(2):49. PubMed ID: 32884856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell measurements by two non-contact specular microscopes.
Gasser L; Reinhard T; Böhringer D
BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26219961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endothelial cell density and characterization of corneal endothelial cells in the Tawny Owl (Strix aluco) using specular microscopy.
Coyo N; Leiva M; Costa D; Molina R; Nicolás O; Ríos J; Peña MT
Vet Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 22(2):177-182. PubMed ID: 29762889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
