BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

916 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11121316)

  • 1. A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty.
    Hamdi M; Greuse M; De Mey A; Webster MH
    Br J Plast Surg; 2001 Jan; 54(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11121316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast sensitivity before and after the L short-scar mammaplasty.
    Chiari A; Nunes TA; Grotting JC; Cotta FB; Gomes RC
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Feb; 36(1):105-14. PubMed ID: 21638163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of nipple and areolar sensation after breast reduction by free nipple graft and inferior pedicle techniques.
    Ahmed OA; Kolhe PS
    Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 53(2):126-9. PubMed ID: 10878835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Periareolar reduction mammoplasty using an inferior dermal pedicle or a central pedicle.
    Cho BC; Yang JD; Baik BS
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 18037359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A superior vertical dermal pedicle for the nipple-areola: an alternative for severe breast hypertrophy and ptosis.
    Abramo AC
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Feb; 36(1):134-9. PubMed ID: 21735338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitation of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques.
    Mofid MM; Dellon AL; Elias JJ; Nahabedian MY
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jun; 109(7):2283-8. PubMed ID: 12045551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis of breast sensation following inferior pedicle mammaplasty and the effect of the volume of resected tissue.
    Wechselberger G; Stoss S; Schoeller T; Oehlbauer M; Piza-Katzer H
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2001; 25(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 11731851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast sensation after superior pedicle versus inferior pedicle mammaplasty: anatomical and histological evaluation.
    Hamdi M; Greuse M; Nemec E; Deprez C; De Mey A
    Br J Plast Surg; 2001 Jan; 54(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 11121317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast sensitivity after vertical mammaplasty.
    Greuse M; Hamdi M; DeMey A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Apr; 107(4):970-6. PubMed ID: 11252091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The superior pedicle mammaplasty for the treatment of pedunculous breast.
    Papalia I; d'Alcontres FS; Colonna MR; Mojallal AM; Foyatier JL
    Ann Ital Chir; 2007; 78(6):503-6. PubMed ID: 18510030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The crossed dermal flaps technique for breast reduction.
    de la Plaza R; de la Cruz L; Moreno C; Soto L
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(6):383-92. PubMed ID: 15633020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction mammaplasty: the results of avoiding nipple-areolar amputation in cases of extreme hypertrophy.
    Chang P; Shaaban AF; Canady JW; Ricciardelli EJ; Cram AE
    Ann Plast Surg; 1996 Dec; 37(6):585-91. PubMed ID: 8988769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of nipple-areola complex sensitivity after the latero-central glandular pedicle technique in breast reduction.
    Hamdi M; Blondeel P; Van de Sijpe K; Van Landuyt K; Monstrey S
    Br J Plast Surg; 2003 Jun; 56(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 12873463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Superior pedicle breast reduction for hypertrophy with massive ptosis.
    Wettstein R; Christofides E; Pittet B; Psaras G; Harder Y
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Apr; 64(4):500-7. PubMed ID: 20580337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques.
    Schlenz I; Rigel S; Schemper M; Kuzbari R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Mar; 115(3):743-51; discussion 752-4. PubMed ID: 15731673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A comparison of long-term outcome of 6 techniques of breast reduction].
    Tairych G; Worseg A; Kuzbari R; Deutinger M; Holle J
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2000 May; 32(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 10929553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-lasting evolution of ptosis control after reduction mammaplasty using the hammock technique.
    Pérez-Macías JM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 17484060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of Lower Breast Pole Length and Nipple-Areola Complex Position Following Superior Pedicle, Short Horizontal Scar Breast Reduction.
    Bitik O; Uzun H
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):690-8. PubMed ID: 27357632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A study of incision pattern and pedicles in reduction mammaplasty].
    Mu DL; Luan J; Mu LH; Liu C
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 21(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 16128095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing reduction mammaplasty specimens between superior and central pedicle techniques: a retrospective study.
    Sivrioglu N; Irkoren S; Soyder A; Özgün H; Erkus M
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2013 Jul; 22(4):348-51. PubMed ID: 23222410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.