These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11122510)
1. Baseline risk as predictor of treatment benefit: three clinical meta-re-analyses. Arends LR; Hoes AW; Lubsen J; Grobbee DE; Stijnen T Stat Med; 2000 Dec; 19(24):3497-518. PubMed ID: 11122510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Thompson SG; Smith TC; Sharp SJ Stat Med; 1997 Dec; 16(23):2741-58. PubMed ID: 9421873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementing informative priors for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using meta-regression and pseudo data. Rhodes KM; Turner RM; White IR; Jackson D; Spiegelhalter DJ; Higgins JP Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(29):5495-5511. PubMed ID: 27577523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian multivariate skew meta-regression models for individual patient data. Ibrahim JG; Kim S; Chen MH; Shah AK; Lin J Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):3415-3436. PubMed ID: 30309294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution]. Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B; Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variation in baseline risk as an explanation of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Walter SD Stat Med; 1997 Dec; 16(24):2883-900. PubMed ID: 9483721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials. Odani M; Fukimbara S; Sato T Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 28059578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study. Smith TC; Spiegelhalter DJ; Thomas A Stat Med; 1995 Dec; 14(24):2685-99. PubMed ID: 8619108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Bayesian sensitivity study of risk difference in the meta-analysis of binary outcomes from sparse data. Vázquez-Polo FJ; Moreno E; Negrín MA; Martel M Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015 Apr; 15(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 25673174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales. Warn DE; Thompson SG; Spiegelhalter DJ Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1601-23. PubMed ID: 12111922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive distributions for between-study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta-analysis. Turner RM; Jackson D; Wei Y; Thompson SG; Higgins JP Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):984-98. PubMed ID: 25475839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS. Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis for 2 x 2 tables: a Bayesian approach. Carlin JB Stat Med; 1992 Jan; 11(2):141-58. PubMed ID: 1349763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Large-sample Bayesian posterior distributions for probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Hazen GB; Huang M Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(5):512-34. PubMed ID: 16997928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups. Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Bayesian approach to sequential meta-analysis. Spence GT; Steinsaltz D; Fanshawe TR Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(29):5356-5375. PubMed ID: 27481499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of the Bayesian dynamic survival model in medicine. He J; McGee DL; Niu X Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(3):347-60. PubMed ID: 20014356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach. Hossain S; Gustafson P Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian robustness in meta-analysis for studies with zero responses. Vázquez FJ; Moreno E; Negrín MA; Martel M Pharm Stat; 2016 May; 15(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 26913715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robustness considerations in Bayesian analysis. Gustafson P Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Dec; 5(4):357-73. PubMed ID: 9004378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]