These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11122510)

  • 21. Network meta-analysis with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Sauter R; Held L
    Biom J; 2015 Nov; 57(6):1038-50. PubMed ID: 26360927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The relation between treatment benefit and underlying risk in meta-analysis.
    Sharp SJ; Thompson SG; Altman DG
    BMJ; 1996 Sep; 313(7059):735-8. PubMed ID: 8819447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Flexibly modeling the baseline risk in meta-analysis.
    Guolo A
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 22807131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A menu-driven software package of Bayesian nonparametric (and parametric) mixed models for regression analysis and density estimation.
    Karabatsos G
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):335-362. PubMed ID: 26956682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Empirical Bayes models of Poisson clinical trials and sample size determination.
    Zaslavsky BG
    Pharm Stat; 2010; 9(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 19513984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accounting for uncertainty due to 'last observation carried forward' outcome imputation in a meta-analysis model.
    Dimitrakopoulou V; Efthimiou O; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):742-52. PubMed ID: 25492741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the dose-response relationships of 2 lipid-lowering agents: a Bayesian meta-analysis.
    Berry DA; Berry SM; McKellar J; Pearson TA
    Am Heart J; 2003 Jun; 145(6):1036-45. PubMed ID: 12796760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bayesian estimation in random effects meta-analysis using a non-informative prior.
    Bodnar O; Link A; Arendacká B; Possolo A; Elster C
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):378-399. PubMed ID: 27790722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Paul M; Riebler A; Bachmann LM; Rue H; Held L
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1325-39. PubMed ID: 20101670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A simplification and implementation of random-effects meta-analyses based on the exact distribution of Cochran's Q.
    Preuß M; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 24317521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Bayesian approach to a general regression model for ROC curves.
    Hellmich M; Abrams KR; Jones DR; Lambert PC
    Med Decis Making; 1998; 18(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 10372587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Semi-parametric modelling of the distribution of the baseline risk in meta-analysis.
    Ghidey W; Lesaffre E; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5434-44. PubMed ID: 17893888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Approximate Bayesian inference for random effects meta-analysis.
    Abrams K; Sansó B
    Stat Med; 1998 Jan; 17(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 9483729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression.
    van Houwelingen HC; Arends LR; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2002 Feb; 21(4):589-624. PubMed ID: 11836738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects.
    Hardy RJ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 8731004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of three different models for estimating relative risk in meta-analysis of clinical trials under unobserved heterogeneity.
    Kuhnert R; Böhning D
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(11):2277-96. PubMed ID: 16991109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bayesian Equivalence Testing and Meta-Analysis in Two-Arm Trials with Binary Data.
    Kpekpena C; Muthukumarana S
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2018; 2018():8134132. PubMed ID: 30159005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.