BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11124034)

  • 1. From minichaperone to GroEL 2: importance of avidity of the multisite ring structure.
    Chatellier J; Hill F; Fersht AR
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Dec; 304(5):883-96. PubMed ID: 11124034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From minichaperone to GroEL 3: properties of an active single-ring mutant of GroEL.
    Chatellier J; Hill F; Foster NW; Goloubinoff P; Fersht AR
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Dec; 304(5):897-910. PubMed ID: 11124035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissociation kinetics of the GroEL-gp31 chaperonin complex studied with Förster resonance energy transfer.
    Calmat S; Hendriks J; van Heerikhuizen H; Schmidt CF; van der Vies SM; Peterman EJ
    Biochemistry; 2009 Dec; 48(49):11692-8. PubMed ID: 19899806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The oligomeric structure of GroEL/GroES is required for biologically significant chaperonin function in protein folding.
    Weber F; Keppel F; Georgopoulos C; Hayer-Hartl MK; Hartl FU
    Nat Struct Biol; 1998 Nov; 5(11):977-85. PubMed ID: 9808043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterisation of mutations in GroES that allow GroEL to function as a single ring.
    Liu H; Kovács E; Lund PA
    FEBS Lett; 2009 Jul; 583(14):2365-71. PubMed ID: 19545569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bacteriophage T4 encodes a co-chaperonin that can substitute for Escherichia coli GroES in protein folding.
    van der Vies SM; Gatenby AA; Georgopoulos C
    Nature; 1994 Apr; 368(6472):654-6. PubMed ID: 7908418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An arginine residue (Arg101), which is conserved in many GroEL homologues, is required for interactions between the two heptameric rings.
    Jones S; Wallington EJ; George R; Lund PA
    J Mol Biol; 1998 Oct; 282(4):789-800. PubMed ID: 9743627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Co-expression of chaperonin GroEL/GroES enhances in vivo folding of yeast mitochondrial aconitase and alters the growth characteristics of Escherichia coli.
    Gupta P; Aggarwal N; Batra P; Mishra S; Chaudhuri TK
    Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 2006; 38(11):1975-85. PubMed ID: 16822698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GroEL walks the fine line: the subtle balance of substrate and co-chaperonin binding by GroEL. A combinatorial investigation by design, selection and screening.
    Kawe M; Plückthun A
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Mar; 357(2):411-26. PubMed ID: 16427651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Allostery wiring diagrams in the transitions that drive the GroEL reaction cycle.
    Tehver R; Chen J; Thirumalai D
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 387(2):390-406. PubMed ID: 19121324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo activities of GroEL minichaperones.
    Chatellier J; Hill F; Lund PA; Fersht AR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Aug; 95(17):9861-6. PubMed ID: 9707566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective ATPase activity and moderate chaperonin-cochaperonin interaction are important for the functional single-ring chaperonin system.
    Illingworth M; Salisbury J; Li W; Lin D; Chen L
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Oct; 466(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 26271593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An expanded protein folding cage in the GroEL-gp31 complex.
    Clare DK; Bakkes PJ; van Heerikhuizen H; van der Vies SM; Saibil HR
    J Mol Biol; 2006 May; 358(3):905-11. PubMed ID: 16549073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Folding of malate dehydrogenase inside the GroEL-GroES cavity.
    Chen J; Walter S; Horwich AL; Smith DL
    Nat Struct Biol; 2001 Aug; 8(8):721-8. PubMed ID: 11473265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex.
    Xu Z; Horwich AL; Sigler PB
    Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6644):741-50. PubMed ID: 9285585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL.
    Rye HS; Burston SG; Fenton WA; Beechem JM; Xu Z; Sigler PB; Horwich AL
    Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6644):792-8. PubMed ID: 9285593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pseudo-T-even bacteriophage RB49 encodes CocO, a cochaperonin for GroEL, which can substitute for Escherichia coli's GroES and bacteriophage T4's Gp31.
    Ang D; Richardson A; Mayer MP; Keppel F; Krisch H; Georgopoulos C
    J Biol Chem; 2001 Mar; 276(12):8720-6. PubMed ID: 11104767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of nucleotide-binding regions in the chaperonin proteins GroEL and GroES.
    Martin J; Geromanos S; Tempst P; Hartl FU
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6452):279-82. PubMed ID: 7901771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of substrate binding site of GroEL minichaperone in solution.
    Tanaka N; Fersht AR
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Sep; 292(1):173-80. PubMed ID: 10493866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reversible oligomerization and denaturation of the chaperonin GroES.
    Seale JW; Gorovits BM; Ybarra J; Horowitz PM
    Biochemistry; 1996 Apr; 35(13):4079-83. PubMed ID: 8672442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.