These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11124664)
1. Intraocular lenses for children in the year 2000: when is oversight by the institutional review board or food and drug administration required? Wilson ME J AAPOS; 2000 Dec; 4(6):325. PubMed ID: 11124664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Cumming JS; Colvard DM; Dell SJ; Doane J; Fine IH; Hoffman RS; Packer M; Slade SG J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):812-25. PubMed ID: 16765800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The IRB as deputy sheriff: proposed FDA regulation of the institutional review board. Huff TA Clin Res; 1979 Apr; 27(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10241072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does your institutional review board review advertising for recruits? McMahon FG Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1988 Jan; 43(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 3335116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Preparing for an FDA audit. Barnes D Epilepsy Res Suppl; 1993; 10():245-50. PubMed ID: 8251103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Innovative tools, regulatory bodies, and the creative surgeon. Reilly JS Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Jun; 129(6):678. PubMed ID: 12810478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional Review Board policies and procedures provide protection for human research subjects and hospitals. Reynolds MB Health Care Law Newsl; 1992 Sep; 7(9):7-11. PubMed ID: 10123075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. United States laws under review. Leahey M Med Device Technol; 2007; 18(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 17585722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The US Food and Drug Administration's New Regulatory Toolkit to Bring Medical Device Innovation Back to the United States. Eydelman MB; Nguyen T; Green JA JAMA Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 134(4):353-4. PubMed ID: 26846511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Devices and the food and drug administration. Phillips SJ; Phillips RS Artif Organs; 2005 May; 29(5):363-5. PubMed ID: 15854210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. User fees and medical device reviews. Lewis C FDA Consum; 2003; 37(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 12715765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clarification: 510k is premarket notification; it provides no patent or FDA approval. Burkhart CG J Drugs Dermatol; 2008 Feb; 7(2):105. PubMed ID: 18335644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Judicial review of FDA preemption determinations. Frost A Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(3):367-88. PubMed ID: 11797704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical devices and the FDA approval process: balancing safety and innovation; comment on "prevalence of fracture and fragment embolization of bard retrievable vena cava filters and clinical implications including cardiac perforation and tamponade". Redberg RF Arch Intern Med; 2010 Nov; 170(20):1831-3. PubMed ID: 20696948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]