These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11124664)

  • 1. Intraocular lenses for children in the year 2000: when is oversight by the institutional review board or food and drug administration required?
    Wilson ME
    J AAPOS; 2000 Dec; 4(6):325. PubMed ID: 11124664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Status of toric intraocular lenses.
    Horn JD
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 18(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 17159449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phakic intraocular lens implant surgery.
    Clin Privil White Pap; 2005 Feb; (226):1-8. PubMed ID: 15688507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Special Report: The American Academy of Ophthalmology Task Force for Developing Novel End Points for Premium Intraocular Lenses Introduction.
    Lum F; Holladay JT; Glasser A; MacRae S; Masket S; Stark W; Rorer E; Tarver ME; Calogero D; Hilmantel G; Nguyen T; Eydelman M
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Jan; 124(1):133-134. PubMed ID: 27743646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accommodative intraocular lenses for age-related cataracts.
    Scott A
    Issues Emerg Health Technol; 2006 Aug; (85):1-6. PubMed ID: 16900603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Special Commentary: Food and Drug Administration and American Academy of Ophthalmology Sponsored: Developing Novel End Points for Premium Intraocular Lenses Workshop.
    Lum F; Tarver ME; Kahook MY; Oetting TA; Rorer E; Hilmantel G; Calogero D; Kiang T; Berdahl JP; Coleman AL; Eydelman MB
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Jul; 122(7):1522-31. PubMed ID: 25896896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Institutional review committees.
    Worthen DM
    J Am Intraocul Implant Soc; 1978 Jan; 4(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 701139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial.
    Cumming JS; Colvard DM; Dell SJ; Doane J; Fine IH; Hoffman RS; Packer M; Slade SG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):812-25. PubMed ID: 16765800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The IRB as deputy sheriff: proposed FDA regulation of the institutional review board.
    Huff TA
    Clin Res; 1979 Apr; 27(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10241072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does your institutional review board review advertising for recruits?
    McMahon FG
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1988 Jan; 43(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 3335116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preparing for an FDA audit.
    Barnes D
    Epilepsy Res Suppl; 1993; 10():245-50. PubMed ID: 8251103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Innovative tools, regulatory bodies, and the creative surgeon.
    Reilly JS
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Jun; 129(6):678. PubMed ID: 12810478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Institutional Review Board policies and procedures provide protection for human research subjects and hospitals.
    Reynolds MB
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1992 Sep; 7(9):7-11. PubMed ID: 10123075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. United States laws under review.
    Leahey M
    Med Device Technol; 2007; 18(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 17585722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The US Food and Drug Administration's New Regulatory Toolkit to Bring Medical Device Innovation Back to the United States.
    Eydelman MB; Nguyen T; Green JA
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 134(4):353-4. PubMed ID: 26846511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Devices and the food and drug administration.
    Phillips SJ; Phillips RS
    Artif Organs; 2005 May; 29(5):363-5. PubMed ID: 15854210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. User fees and medical device reviews.
    Lewis C
    FDA Consum; 2003; 37(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 12715765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clarification: 510k is premarket notification; it provides no patent or FDA approval.
    Burkhart CG
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2008 Feb; 7(2):105. PubMed ID: 18335644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judicial review of FDA preemption determinations.
    Frost A
    Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(3):367-88. PubMed ID: 11797704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical devices and the FDA approval process: balancing safety and innovation; comment on "prevalence of fracture and fragment embolization of bard retrievable vena cava filters and clinical implications including cardiac perforation and tamponade".
    Redberg RF
    Arch Intern Med; 2010 Nov; 170(20):1831-3. PubMed ID: 20696948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.