These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11124724)

  • 1. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations.
    Bombardier C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Dec; 25(24):3100-3. PubMed ID: 11124724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain.
    Chapman JR; Norvell DC; Hermsmeyer JT; Bransford RJ; DeVine J; McGirt MJ; Lee MJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S54-68. PubMed ID: 21952190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
    Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.
    DeVine J; Norvell DC; Ecker E; Fourney DR; Vaccaro A; Wang J; Andersson G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S69-74. PubMed ID: 21897347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery: the patient's perspective].
    Ayerbe-Gracia J; Sousa-Casasnovas P
    Neurocirugia (Astur); 2004 Oct; 15(5):447-57. PubMed ID: 15558202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.
    Davidson M; Keating JL
    Phys Ther; 2002 Jan; 82(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 11784274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures.
    Bombardier C; Hayden J; Beaton DE
    J Rheumatol; 2001 Feb; 28(2):431-8. PubMed ID: 11246692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use.
    Deyo RA; Battie M; Beurskens AJ; Bombardier C; Croft P; Koes B; Malmivaara A; Roland M; Von Korff M; Waddell G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Sep; 23(18):2003-13. PubMed ID: 9779535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The pain disability questionnaire: a new psychometrically sound measure for chronic musculoskeletal disorders.
    Anagnostis C; Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Oct; 29(20):2290-302; discussion 2303. PubMed ID: 15480144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain.
    Taylor SJ; Taylor AE; Foy MA; Fogg AJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1805-12. PubMed ID: 10488511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.
    Copay AG; Martin MM; Subach BR; Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Schuler TC; Berven S
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 20171937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes measurement for patients with low back pain.
    Resnik L; Dobrykowski E
    Orthop Nurs; 2005; 24(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 15722968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Cleland JA; Whitman JM; Houser JL; Wainner RS; Childs JD
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):921-31. PubMed ID: 22749295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring participation in patients with chronic back pain-the 5-Item Pain Disability Index.
    McKillop AB; Carroll LJ; Dick BD; Battié MC
    Spine J; 2018 Feb; 18(2):307-313. PubMed ID: 28735767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Short Form 36 health survey in spine disease--validation against condition-specific measures.
    Guilfoyle MR; Seeley H; Laing RJ
    Br J Neurosurg; 2009 Aug; 23(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 19637011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
    Nakamura M; Miyamoto K; Shimizu K
    J Orthop Sci; 2009 Jul; 14(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19662468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.
    Roland M; Fairbank J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Dec; 25(24):3115-24. PubMed ID: 11124727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?
    Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 20362248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy versus functional technique in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
    Castro-Sánchez AM; Lara-Palomo IC; Matarán-Peñarrocha GA; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C; Saavedra-Hernández M; Cleland J; Aguilar-Ferrándiz ME
    Spine J; 2016 Mar; 16(3):302-12. PubMed ID: 26362233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.