These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11124878)

  • 21. The genomic response to courtship song stimulation in female Drosophila melanogaster.
    Immonen E; Ritchie MG
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Apr; 279(1732):1359-65. PubMed ID: 21976688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mutations and natural genetic variation in the courtship song of Drosophila.
    Gleason JM
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 15864442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Courtship song analysis of Drosophila muscle mutants.
    Chakravorty S; Wajda MP; Vigoreaux JO
    Methods; 2012 Jan; 56(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 21945578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. No evidence for learned mating discrimination in male Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Kandul NP; Wright KM; Kandul EV; Noor MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 6():54. PubMed ID: 16824212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genetic analysis of mate discrimination in Drosophila simulans.
    Chu Y; Yang E; Schinaman JM; Chahda JS; Sousa-Neves R
    Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2335-47. PubMed ID: 23888855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Female
    Brüggemeier B; Porter MA; Vigoreaux JO; Goodwin SF
    Biol Open; 2018 Jun; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 29666051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fitness effects of female mate choice: preferred males are detrimental for Drosophila melanogaster females.
    Friberg U; Arnqvist G
    J Evol Biol; 2003 Sep; 16(5):797-811. PubMed ID: 14635895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. THE REPRODUCTIVE RELATIONSHIPS OF DROSOPHILA SECHELLIA WITH D. MAURITIANA, D. SIMULANS, AND D. MELANOGASTER FROM THE AFROTROPICAL REGION.
    Lachaise D; David JR; Lemeunier F; Tsacas L; Ashburner M
    Evolution; 1986 Mar; 40(2):262-271. PubMed ID: 28556049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Barriers to gene exchange in hybridizing field crickets: the role of male courtship effort and cuticular hydrocarbons.
    Maroja LS; McKenzie ZM; Hart E; Jing J; Larson EL; Richardson DP
    BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 14(1):65. PubMed ID: 24678642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Copulatory courtship behavior and sine song as a mate recognition cue in Drosophila lini and its sibling species.
    Wen SY; Yamada H; Li YF; Kimura MT; Oguma Y; Sawamura K; Toda MJ
    Zoolog Sci; 2011 Jul; 28(7):469-75. PubMed ID: 21728794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neural pathways for the detection and discrimination of conspecific song in D. melanogaster.
    Vaughan AG; Zhou C; Manoli DS; Baker BS
    Curr Biol; 2014 May; 24(10):1039-49. PubMed ID: 24794294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variation and consistency of female preferences for simulated courtship songs in Drosophila virilis.
    Isoherranen E; Aspi J; Hoikkala A
    Anim Behav; 1999 Mar; 57(3):619-625. PubMed ID: 10196051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Courtship songs of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. II. Genetics of species differences.
    Williams MA; Blouin AG; Noor MA
    Heredity (Edinb); 2001 Jan; 86(Pt 1):68-77. PubMed ID: 11298817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. THE GENETIC BASIS OF SEXUAL ISOLATION BETWEEN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND D. SIMULANS.
    Welbergen P; van Dijken FR; Scharloo W; Köhler W
    Evolution; 1992 Oct; 46(5):1385-1398. PubMed ID: 28568993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural circuit mechanisms of sexual receptivity in Drosophila females.
    Wang K; Wang F; Forknall N; Yang T; Patrick C; Parekh R; Dickson BJ
    Nature; 2021 Jan; 589(7843):577-581. PubMed ID: 33239786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fruit fly courtship: The female perspective.
    Dukas R; Scott A
    Curr Zool; 2015 Dec; 61(6):1008-1014. PubMed ID: 32256538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Why do males choose heterospecific females in the red spider mite?
    Sato Y; Staudacher H; Sabelis MW
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2016 Jan; 68(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 26530994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Female European starling preference and choice for variation in conspecific male song.
    Gentner TQ; Hulse SH
    Anim Behav; 2000 Feb; 59(2):443-458. PubMed ID: 10675267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Courtship song rhythms in Drosophila yakuba.
    Demetriades MC; Thackeray JR; Kyriacou CP
    Anim Behav; 1999 Feb; 57(2):379-386. PubMed ID: 10049478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.