151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11125345)
1. Accuracy of three corrective techniques for implant bar fabrication.
Romero GG; Engelmeier R; Powers JM; Canterbury AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Dec; 84(6):602-7. PubMed ID: 11125345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
Goossens IC; Herbst D
SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An alternative section method for casting and posterior laser welding of metallic frameworks for an implant-supported prosthesis.
de Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mde G; Ribeiro RF
J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 19141050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.
Takahashi T; Gunne J
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 12644800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modified section method for laser-welding of ill-fitting cp Ti and Ni-Cr alloy one-piece cast implant-supported frameworks.
Tiossi R; Falcão-Filho H; Aguiar Júnior FA; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 20149062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro investigation of marginal accuracy of implant-supported screw-retained partial dentures.
Koke U; Wolf A; Lenz P; Gilde H
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 May; 31(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 15140174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
Wise M
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Over-refractory casting technique as an alternative to one-piece multi-unit fixed partial denture frameworks.
de Oliveira Correa G; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF; Sobrinho LC
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16543023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the passivity between cast alloy and laser-welded titanium overdenture bars.
Paiva J; Givan DA; Broome JC; Lemons JE; McCracken MS
J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):656-62. PubMed ID: 19682220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An initial study of diffusion bonds between superplastic Ti-6Al-4V for implant dentistry applications.
Elias KL; Daehn GS; Brantley WA; McGlumphy EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):357-65. PubMed ID: 17618918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fit of cast commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy crowns before and after marginal refinement by electrical discharge machining.
Contreras EF; Henriques GE; Giolo SR; Nobilo MA
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12473994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
