These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11125652)

  • 21. Personnel selection and the five-factor model: reexamining the effects of appplicant's frame of reference.
    Smith DB; Hanges PJ; Dickson MW
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Apr; 86(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 11393442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the relation between personality and job performance of airline pilots.
    Hormann HJ; Maschke P
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 11762439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reliability and Construct Validity of the Portuguese Version of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire.
    Antunes AC; Caetano A; Pina E Cunha M
    Psychol Rep; 2017 Jun; 120(3):520-536. PubMed ID: 28558609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A test of a proposed method for estimating validity of a multivariate composite predictor: extending the job component validity model.
    Hoffman CC; Morris D; Luck G
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):900-16. PubMed ID: 20099553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Construct validity of adolescents' self-reported big five personality traits: importance of conceptual breadth and initial validation of a short measure.
    Morizot J
    Assessment; 2014 Oct; 21(5):580-606. PubMed ID: 24619971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Leadership, collective personality, and performance.
    Hofmann DA; Jones LM
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):509-22. PubMed ID: 15910146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives.
    Judge TA; Rodell JB; Klinger RL; Simon LS; Crawford ER
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Nov; 98(6):875-925. PubMed ID: 24016206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):499-530. PubMed ID: 21319880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis.
    Chiaburu DS; Oh IS; Berry CM; Li N; Gardner RG
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Nov; 96(6):1140-66. PubMed ID: 21688883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing the validity of sales self-efficacy: a cautionary tale.
    Gupta N; Ganster DC; Kepes S
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jul; 98(4):690-700. PubMed ID: 23506411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews.
    Huffcutt AI; Conway JM; Roth PL; Stone NJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):897-913. PubMed ID: 11596806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance.
    McCarthy JM; Van Iddekinge CH; Lievens F; Kung MC; Sinar EF; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Sep; 98(5):701-19. PubMed ID: 23937298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relationship between explicit and implicit personality: Evidence from the Big Five and trait emotional intelligence.
    Hasan NN; Petrides KV; Hull L
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0287013. PubMed ID: 37812628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retesting personality in employee selection: implications of the context, sample, and setting.
    Holladay CL; David E; Johnson SK
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Apr; 112(2):486-501. PubMed ID: 23833877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Big Five personality traits, job satisfaction and subjective wellbeing in China.
    Zhai Q; Willis M; O'Shea B; Zhai Y; Yang Y
    Int J Psychol; 2013; 48(6):1099-108. PubMed ID: 23075216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acquaintance ratings of the Big Five personality traits: incremental validity beyond and interactive effects with self-reports in the prediction of workplace deviance.
    Kluemper DH; McLarty BD; Bing MN
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Jan; 100(1):237-48. PubMed ID: 25198097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Understanding the role of social capital in adolescents' Big Five personality effects on school-to-work transitions.
    Baay PE; van Aken MA; de Ridder DT; van der Lippe T
    J Adolesc; 2014 Jul; 37(5):739-48. PubMed ID: 24837714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How distinctive are morningness and eveningness from the Big Five factors of personality? A meta-analytic investigation.
    Lipnevich AA; Credè M; Hahn E; Spinath FM; Roberts RD; Preckel F
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Mar; 112(3):491-509. PubMed ID: 27977220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies.
    Law KS; Wong CS; Song LJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):483-96. PubMed ID: 15161407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Positive manifold limits the relevance of content-matching strategies for validating selection test batteries.
    Murphy KR; Dzieweczynski JL; Zhang Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1018-31. PubMed ID: 19594241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.