These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11125659)

  • 1. Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings.
    Scullen SE; Mount MK; Goff M
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Dec; 85(6):956-70. PubMed ID: 11125659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A mixture Rasch facets model for rater's illusory halo effects.
    Jin KY; Chiu MM
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Dec; 54(6):2750-2764. PubMed ID: 35018607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable?
    Facteau JD; Craig SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Apr; 86(2):215-27. PubMed ID: 11393435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism.
    Ng KY; Koh C; Ang S; Kennedy JC; Chan KY
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):1033-44. PubMed ID: 21480684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The roles of rater goals and ratee performance levels in the distortion of performance ratings.
    Wang XM; Wong KF; Kwong JY
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 May; 95(3):546-61. PubMed ID: 20476832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informational advantages in social networks: The core-periphery divide in peer performance ratings.
    Zhao HH; Li N; Harris TB; Rosen CC; Zhang X
    J Appl Psychol; 2021 Jul; 106(7):1093-1102. PubMed ID: 32852987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Race of ratee and anonymity of rater: a study comparing students with practitioners as performance appraisers.
    Beaulieu RP
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Oct; 97(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 16342570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The moderating influence of job performance dimensions on convergence of supervisory and peer ratings of job performance: unconfounding construct-level convergence and rating difficulty.
    Viswesvaran C; Schmidt FL; Ones DS
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):345-54. PubMed ID: 12002962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of sex on raters' accountability.
    Shore TH; Tashchian A
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Apr; 92(2):693-702. PubMed ID: 12785662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The implications of unconfounding multisource performance ratings.
    Jackson DJR; Michaelides G; Dewberry C; Schwencke B; Toms S
    J Appl Psychol; 2020 Mar; 105(3):312-329. PubMed ID: 31328925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: a meta-analytic test of a process model.
    Heidemeier H; Moser K
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):353-70. PubMed ID: 19271795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence of the construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance.
    Scullen SE; Mount MK; Judge TA
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Feb; 88(1):50-66. PubMed ID: 12675394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer ratings of depression, anxiety, and aggression in inpatient and elementary school children: rating biases and influence of rater's self-reported depression, anxiety, and aggression.
    Epkins CC
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1994 Oct; 22(5):611-28. PubMed ID: 7822632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of certain rater roles on confidence in physician's assistant ratings.
    Dowaliby FJ
    J Med Educ; 1977 Nov; 52(11):914-9. PubMed ID: 21295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes, self-monitoring, and appraisal behaviors.
    Jawahar M
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):875-83. PubMed ID: 11596804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales.
    Borman WC; Buck DE; Hanson MA; Motowidlo SJ; Stark S; Drasgow F
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):965-73. PubMed ID: 11596812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling error variance in job specification ratings: the influence of rater, job, and organization-level factors.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Raymark PH; Eidson CE
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 15769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Cognitive Evaluation of Frame-of-Reference Rater Training: Content and Process Issues.
    Schleicher DJ; Day DV
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1998 Jan; 73(1):76-101. PubMed ID: 9705795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding performance ratings: dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose.
    Reb J; Greguras GJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Jan; 95(1):213-20. PubMed ID: 20085418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cultural values and performance appraisal: assessing the effects of rater self-construal on performance ratings.
    Mishra V; Roch SG
    J Psychol; 2013; 147(4):325-44. PubMed ID: 23885636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.