These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11126067)
1. The right to choose. Cesarean sections are on the rise again. Public-health officials want to limit them, but many patients and doctors are resisting. Springen K Newsweek; 2000 Dec; 136(23):73-4. PubMed ID: 11126067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Caesarean section: every woman's right to choose? Paterson-Brown S; Fisk NM Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 9(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 9425576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. C-sections rise but may not be the kindest cut. Brink S US News World Rep; 2000 Sep; 129(9):63. PubMed ID: 11066834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cesarean delivery by patient choice: where do things stand? Herbert WN Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2007 Mar; 62(3):153-4. PubMed ID: 17306040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Keeler EB; Brodie M Milbank Q; 1993; 71(3):365-404. PubMed ID: 8413067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Labor limits: does restricting movement result in higher cesarean section rates? Evans-Lynn CJ Adv NPs PAs; 2012 Oct; 3(10):29-31, 36. PubMed ID: 23082608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service? Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outreach program slashes Florida health network's rate of cesarean sections. Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1998 Sep; 3(9):137-8. PubMed ID: 10185344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale. Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to women with "no indicated risk," United States, 1998-2001 birth cohorts. MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 16948717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cesarean section rate levels off in 1987. Taffel SM; Placek PJ; Moien M Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(5):227-8. PubMed ID: 2806490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Non-indicated cesarean section--does the "Golem" counteract?]. Herman A Harefuah; 2011 Nov; 150(11):866-9, 874. PubMed ID: 22428210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cesarean section on maternal request: a societal and professional failure and symptom of a much larger problem. Klein MC Birth; 2012 Dec; 39(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 23281950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery. Liu S; Heaman M; Joseph KS; Liston RM; Huang L; Sauve R; Kramer MS; Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):836-42. PubMed ID: 15802414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study. Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]