These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11126525)

  • 1. An application of pain rating scales in geriatric patients.
    Bergh I; Sjöström B; Odén A; Steen B
    Aging (Milano); 2000 Oct; 12(5):380-7. PubMed ID: 11126525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing pain and pain relief in geriatric patients with non-pathological fractures with different rating scales.
    Bergh I; Sjöström B; Odén A; Steen B
    Aging (Milano); 2001 Oct; 13(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 11820708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department.
    Bijur PE; Latimer CT; Gallagher EJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 10(4):390-2. PubMed ID: 12670856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The psychometric properties of an Arabic numeric pain rating scale for measuring osteoarthritis knee pain.
    Alghadir AH; Anwer S; Iqbal ZA
    Disabil Rehabil; 2016 Dec; 38(24):2392-7. PubMed ID: 26733318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement among anesthesiologists regarding postoperative pain assessment in dogs.
    Hofmeister EH; Barletta M; Shepard M; Brainard BM; Trim CM; Quandt J
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2018 Sep; 45(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 30078533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pain rating in the ED-a comparison between 2 scales in a Swedish hospital.
    Göransson KE; Heilborn U; Selberg J; von Scheele S; Djärv T
    Am J Emerg Med; 2015 Mar; 33(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 25624078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults.
    Li L; Liu X; Herr K
    Pain Med; 2007 Apr; 8(3):223-34. PubMed ID: 17371409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of a verbally administered numeric rating scale to measure cancer pain intensity.
    Paice JA; Cohen FL
    Cancer Nurs; 1997 Apr; 20(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 9145556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparison of Pain Assessment Measures in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: Visual Analog Scale Versus Numeric Rating Scale.
    Myrvik MP; Drendel AL; Brandow AM; Yan K; Hoffmann RG; Panepinto JA
    J Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 37(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 25575295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of three self-report pain scales in adults with acute pain.
    Bahreini M; Jalili M; Moradi-Lakeh M
    J Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 48(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 25271179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verbal numerical scales are as reliable and sensitive as visual analog scales for rating dyspnea in young and older subjects.
    Morris NR; Sabapathy S; Adams L; Kingsley RA; Schneider DA; Stulbarg MS
    Respir Physiol Neurobiol; 2007 Aug; 157(2-3):360-5. PubMed ID: 17303478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults.
    Herr KA; Spratt K; Mobily PR; Richardson G
    Clin J Pain; 2004; 20(4):207-19. PubMed ID: 15218405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales: a cross sectional description of pain etiology groups.
    Lund I; Lundeberg T; Sandberg L; Budh CN; Kowalski J; Svensson E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():31. PubMed ID: 16202149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning from pain scales: patient perspective.
    Clark P; Lavielle P; Martínez H
    J Rheumatol; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1584-8. PubMed ID: 12858463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensation and Distress of Pain Scales: reliability, validity, and sensitivity.
    Good M; Stiller C; Zauszniewski JA; Anderson GC; Stanton-Hicks M; Grass JA
    J Nurs Meas; 2001; 9(3):219-38. PubMed ID: 11881266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evaluation of smartphone versions of the visual analogue scale and numeric rating scale as postoperative pain assessment tools: a prospective randomized trial.
    Chiu LYL; Sun T; Ree R; Dunsmuir D; Dotto A; Ansermino JM; Yarnold C
    Can J Anaesth; 2019 Jun; 66(6):706-715. PubMed ID: 30796700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain.
    Alghadir AH; Anwer S; Iqbal A; Iqbal ZA
    J Pain Res; 2018; 11():851-856. PubMed ID: 29731662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.
    Hjermstad MJ; Fayers PM; Haugen DF; Caraceni A; Hanks GW; Loge JH; Fainsinger R; Aass N; Kaasa S;
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2011 Jun; 41(6):1073-93. PubMed ID: 21621130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A pilot assessment of alternative methods of quantifying dental pain with particular reference to dentine hypersensitivity.
    Gillam DG; Bulman JS; Newman HN
    Community Dent Health; 1997 Jun; 14(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 9225538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring pain intensity in older patients: a comparison of five scales.
    Nimmaanrat S; Thepsuwan A; Tipchatyotin S; Jensen MP
    BMC Geriatr; 2024 Jun; 24(1):556. PubMed ID: 38918711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.