These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11126696)

  • 1. Meta-analyses of clinical drug trials--gold standard reviews or statistical alchemy?
    Chan ES
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2000 Sep; 29(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 11126696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals].
    Schnabel A; Kranke P
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2010 Jul; 45(7-8):510-8. PubMed ID: 20665362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice.
    Higgins J; Thompson S; Deeks J; Altman D
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2002 Jan; 7(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 11822262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review.
    Conn HO
    J Intern Med; 1997 Mar; 241(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 9104430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold?
    Papageorgiou SN
    J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 25404669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to Perform a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Imaging Studies.
    Cronin P; Kelly AM; Altaee D; Foerster B; Petrou M; Dwamena BA
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):573-593. PubMed ID: 29371119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An appraisal of meta-analysis guidelines: how do they relate to safety outcomes?
    Bennetts M; Whalen E; Ahadieh S; Cappelleri JC
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):64-78. PubMed ID: 27612447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A practical guide to meta-analysis.
    Chung KC; Burns PB; Kim HM
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Dec; 31(10):1671-8. PubMed ID: 17145390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Synthesising conceptual frameworks for patient and public involvement in research - a critical appraisal of a meta-narrative review.
    Evans D; Hopewell-Kelly N; Kok M; White J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):116. PubMed ID: 30359226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy: protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
    Gan J; Ma D; Xiong T
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e029811. PubMed ID: 31296513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.
    da Costa BR; Juni P
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Dec; 35(47):3336-45. PubMed ID: 25416325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.
    Glenny AM; Altman DG; Song F; Sakarovitch C; Deeks JJ; D'Amico R; Bradburn M; Eastwood AJ;
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jul; 9(26):1-134, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis: when and how.
    Imperiale TF
    Hepatology; 1999 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):26S-31S. PubMed ID: 10386080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.
    Clarke MJ; Stewart LA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9238566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.