173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11126935)
1. The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: positions of shared phonemes.
Li X; Schweickert R; Gandour J
Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1116-25. PubMed ID: 11126935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the necessary conditions for phonological interference in serial recall.
James T; Roodenrys S
Memory; 2023 Aug; 31(7):891-904. PubMed ID: 37165512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: is there an effect on all trials?
Saint-Aubin J; Ouellette D; Poirier M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 15945210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
Coltheart V
Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immediate serial recall, word frequency, item identity and item position.
Poirier M; Saint-Aubin J
Can J Exp Psychol; 1996 Dec; 50(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 9025332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phonological similarity neighborhoods and children's short-term memory: typical development and dyslexia.
Thomson JM; Richardson U; Goswami U
Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1210-9. PubMed ID: 16532854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phonological similarity in working memory.
Copeland DE; Radvansky GA
Mem Cognit; 2001 Jul; 29(5):774-6. PubMed ID: 11531232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.
Schweickert R
Mem Cognit; 1993 Mar; 21(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 8469125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reversing the phonological similarity effect.
Nairne JS; Kelley MR
Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 10087855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phonological similarity in the serial recall task hinders item recall, not just order.
Roodenrys S; Guitard D; Miller LM; Saint-Aubin J; Barron JM
Br J Psychol; 2022 Nov; 113(4):1100-1120. PubMed ID: 35692188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overwriting of phonemic features in serial recall.
Lange EB; Oberauer K
Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):333-9. PubMed ID: 15948618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Input and output modes modulate phonological and semantic contributions to immediate serial recall: evidence from a brain-damaged patient.
Chassé V; Belleville S
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 26(2):195-216. PubMed ID: 19418315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The phonological similarity effect in short-term memory serial recall in schizophrenia.
Elvevåg B; Weinberger DR; Goldberg TE
Psychiatry Res; 2002 Sep; 112(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 12379453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
Coltheart V; Langdon R
Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repetition learning in the immediate serial recall of visual and auditory materials.
Page MP; Cumming N; Norris D; Hitch GJ; McNeil AM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):716-33. PubMed ID: 16822143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interactions Between Item Set and Vocoding in Serial Recall.
Bosen AK; Luckasen MC
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1404-1417. PubMed ID: 31033634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phonological working memory in German children with poor reading and spelling abilities.
Steinbrink C; Klatte M
Dyslexia; 2008 Nov; 14(4):271-90. PubMed ID: 17979186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition.
Oberauer K
Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):346-57. PubMed ID: 19246349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
