These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1112717)

  • 1. The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
    Moeller DW
    Health Phys; 1975 Mar; 28(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 1112717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nuclear reactor safety: a new dilemma for the AEC.
    Gillette R
    Science; 1971 Jul; 173(3992):126-30. PubMed ID: 5581905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety of DOE reactors questioned.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1987 Nov; 238(4828):741. PubMed ID: 3672120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nuclear safety: NRC investigates Seabrook.
    Collins E
    Nature; 1986 Nov 20-26; 324(6094):203. PubMed ID: 3785390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-dose radiation: latest data renew questions of 'safe' level.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1990 Aug; 264(5):553-4, 557. PubMed ID: 2366287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The safety goals of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Okrent D
    Science; 1987 Apr; 236(4799):296-300. PubMed ID: 3563510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whatever happened to reactor safety?
    Kerr W
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1983 Dec; 59(10):907-11. PubMed ID: 6582978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nuclear power after Chernobyl.
    Ahearne JF
    Science; 1987 May; 236(4802):673-9. PubMed ID: 3576192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probabilistic reliability analysis, quantitative safety goals, and nuclear licensing in the United Kingdom.
    Cannell W
    Risk Anal; 1987 Sep; 7(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 3685540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nuclear safety: United States opts for caution.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1986 Dec 18-31; 324(6098):607. PubMed ID: 3796725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nuclear reactor safety: a skeleton at the feast?
    Gillette R
    Science; 1971 May; 172(3986):918-9. PubMed ID: 5573563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nuclear power plants. Nightmares or neighbors?
    Stanford TM
    Emergency; 1987 Mar; 19(3):37-41, 54. PubMed ID: 10280798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The spotlight is now on the Federal agencies.
    Int J Occup Health Saf; 1974; 43(6):18-9. PubMed ID: 4430547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Government nuclear accident planning--do doctors have confidence in it?
    Morrison L
    Med War; 1989; 5(4):173-4. PubMed ID: 2622416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental legislation and regulation.
    Jorkasky JF
    J Hosp Supply Process Distrib; 1985; 3(4):60-2. PubMed ID: 10272439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'Common sense' in enforcement of inspections and regulations in occupational health and safety.
    Curran WJ
    Am J Public Health; 1978 Jan; 68(1):73. PubMed ID: 623367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nuclear safety: damaged fuel ignites a new debate in AEC.
    Gillette R
    Science; 1972 Jul; 177(4046):330-1. PubMed ID: 5035481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Receipt of byproduct and special nuclear material--NRC. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1992 Oct; 57(204):47978-83. PubMed ID: 10121919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Reactor safety and human failure].
    Smidt D
    Naturwissenschaften; 1979 Dec; 66(12):593-600. PubMed ID: 537639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NIOSH under siege.
    Sun M
    Science; 1981 Jul; 213(4505):315. PubMed ID: 7244616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.