364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11127599)
1. Spiral interpolation algorithms for multislice spiral CT--part II: measurement and evaluation of slice sensitivity profiles and noise at a clinical multislice system.
Fuchs T; Krause J; Schaller S; Flohr T; Kalender WA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Sep; 19(9):835-47. PubMed ID: 11127599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Slice sensitivity profile and image pixel noise of multi-slice spiral CT in comparison with single slice spiral CT].
Schorn C; Obenauer S; Funke M; Hermann KP; Kopka L; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1999 Sep; 171(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 10520332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New technical developments in multislice CT--Part 1: Approaching isotropic resolution with sub-millimeter 16-slice scanning.
Flohr T; Stierstorfer K; Bruder H; Simon J; Schaller S
Rofo; 2002 Jul; 174(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 12101473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 16-slice CT scanner.
Flohr T; Stierstorfer K; Bruder H; Simon J; Polacin A; Schaller S
Med Phys; 2003 May; 30(5):832-45. PubMed ID: 12772991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of z-axis resolution and image noise for nonconstant velocity spiral CT data reconstructed using a weighted 3D filtered backprojection (WFBP) reconstruction algorithm.
Christner JA; Stierstorfer K; Primak AN; Eusemann CD; Flohr TG; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):897-906. PubMed ID: 20229899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot.
Flohr TG; Stierstorfer K; Ulzheimer S; Bruder H; Primak AN; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2536-47. PubMed ID: 16193784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image reconstruction and performance evaluation for ECG-gated spiral scanning with a 16-slice CT system.
Flohr T; Ohnesorge B; Bruder H; Stierstorfer K; Simon J; Suess C; Schaller S
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2650-62. PubMed ID: 14596302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom.
Paul J; Krauss B; Banckwitz R; Maentele W; Bauer RW; Vogl TJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):e699-703. PubMed ID: 21316888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart.
Kachelriess M; Ulzheimer S; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1881-902. PubMed ID: 10984235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a dual source CT scanner.
Flohr TG; Bruder H; Stierstorfer K; Petersilka M; Schmidt B; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5882-97. PubMed ID: 19175144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance assessment of dynamic spiral scan modes with variable pitch for quantitative perfusion computed tomography.
Haberland U; Klotz E; Abolmaali N
Invest Radiol; 2010 Jul; 45(7):378-86. PubMed ID: 20440213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The evaluation of the physical characteristics of a volumetric computer tomograph].
Crespi A; Leoni S; Montanari G; Paruccini N; Pedroli G; Grimaldi M; Salvini E
Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):460-6. PubMed ID: 8643860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flat panel detector-based volumetric computed tomography (fpVCT): performance evaluation of volumetric methods by using different phantoms in comparison to 64-multislice computed tomography.
Obenauer S; Dullin C; Heuser M
Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 17414524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-source spiral CT with pitch up to 3.2 and 75 ms temporal resolution: image reconstruction and assessment of image quality.
Flohr TG; Leng S; Yu L; Aiimendinger T; Bruder H; Petersilka M; Eusemann CD; Stierstorfer K; Schmidt B; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5641-53. PubMed ID: 20095277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography.
Mahnken AH; Seyfarth T; Flohr T; Herzog C; Stahl J; Stanzel S; Kuettner A; Wildberger JE; Günther RW
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 15597014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Factors of image quality in spiral x-ray computed tomography].
Ernst O; Gaillandre L; Mizrahi D; Sergent G; Bonvarlet P; L'Herminé C
J Radiol; 1995 Dec; 76(12):1069-74. PubMed ID: 8676293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot.
Flohr T; Stierstorfer K; Raupach R; Ulzheimer S; Bruder H
Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1803-10. PubMed ID: 15573292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Slice thickness of spiral CT images as function of pitch].
Wallschläger H
J Radiol; 1998 Aug; 79(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 9757311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. System performance of multislice spiral computed tomography.
Fuchs TO; Kachelriess M; Kalender WA
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2000; 19(5):63-70. PubMed ID: 11016031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical aspects of helical (spiral) CT.
Brink JA
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Sep; 33(5):825-41. PubMed ID: 7676010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
