These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11127691)

  • 1. Possible anticompetitive agreements between brand, generic companies to be studied.
    Landis NT
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2000 Dec; 57(23):2140, 2142. PubMed ID: 11127691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Targeting Unconscionable Prescription-Drug Prices - Maryland's Anti-Price-Gouging Law.
    Greene JA; Padula WV
    N Engl J Med; 2017 Jul; 377(2):101-103. PubMed ID: 28591520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Settlements between brand and generic pharmaceutical companies: a reasonable antitrust analysis of reverse payments.
    Yvon AM
    Fordham Law Rev; 2006 Dec; 75(3):1883-912. PubMed ID: 17312596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The "reverse payment paradox": an overview of the legality of reverse exclusionary payments in the pharmaceutical industry.
    Brockmeier MS
    Health Care Law Mon; 2010 Mar; 2010(3):2-10. PubMed ID: 20329564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Delaying generic competition--corporate payoffs and the future of Plavix.
    Shuchman M
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Sep; 355(13):1297-300. PubMed ID: 17005945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Eleventh Circuit holds that agreements in which pharmaceutical companies pay generic companies not to compete may be valid.
    Garrigues A
    J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 15152443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brand-name drug manufacturers risk antitrust violations by slowing generic production through patent layering.
    Paine CS
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):479-510. PubMed ID: 12715807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pharmaceutical patent settlements: the antitrust risks.
    Balto DA
    Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(3):321-41. PubMed ID: 11824464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unsettling drug patent settlements: a framework for presumptive illegality.
    Carrier MA
    Mich Law Rev; 2009 Oct; 108(1):37-80. PubMed ID: 20535881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extent of Drug Patents With Terminal Disclaimers and Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rejections.
    Tu SS; Kesselheim AS; Chao B
    JAMA; 2024 Sep; 332(10):837-838. PubMed ID: 39133468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AstraZeneca must pay €52.5m fine for anticompetitive tactics, rules European court.
    Hawkes N
    BMJ; 2012 Dec; 345():e8396. PubMed ID: 23230222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are reverse payments and pay-for-delay settlements business as usual or an anticompetitive practice?
    Shah S; Silva MA; Malloy MJ
    Nat Biotechnol; 2016 Jul; 34(7):716-9. PubMed ID: 27404880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reanalyzing reverse payment settlements: a solution to the patentee's dilemma.
    Wang Z
    Cornell Law Rev; 2014 Jul; 99(5):1227-58. PubMed ID: 25112001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A generic problem.
    Hanauer SB
    Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Dec; 3(12):649. PubMed ID: 17130869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Supreme Court to decide whether payments by patent holders to delay production of generics are anticompetitive.
    Roehr B
    BMJ; 2012 Dec; 345():e8464. PubMed ID: 23236054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antitrust, Market Exclusivity, and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Industry.
    Sinha MS; Curfman GD; Carrier MA
    JAMA; 2018 Jun; 319(22):2271-2272. PubMed ID: 29801104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A shift on "pay for delay"--reopening doors for pharmaceutical competition?
    Hemphill Kraus EJ
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Nov; 367(18):1681-3. PubMed ID: 23113478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sword or shield? An overview and competitive analysis of the marketing of "authorized generics".
    Zain S
    Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(4):739-77. PubMed ID: 18557229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regulators can challenge deals that delay generic competition, says US Supreme Court.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2013 Jun; 346():f3964. PubMed ID: 23783361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Branded drug reformulation: the next brand vs. generic antitrust battleground.
    Amoresano GV
    Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 17444032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.