117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11127749)
1. Competency assessment and proficiency testing.
Davey DD; McGoogan E; Somrak TM; Allen KA; Beccati D; Cramer SF; Frable WJ; Hauser NJ; Hewer EM; Lestadi J; Lulla MK; O'Rourke D; Suprun HZ
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(6):939-43. PubMed ID: 11127749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized training and proficiency testing. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Vooijs GP; Davey DD; Somrak TM; Goodell RM; Grohs DH; Knesel EA; Mango LJ; Mui KK; Nielsen ML; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 9479333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulatory closure of cervical cytology laboratories: recommendations for a public health response.
MMWR Recomm Rep; 1997 Dec; 46(RR-17):1-19. PubMed ID: 9409538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of proficiency testing in ensuring quality: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 3.
Howell LP; Nayar R; Savaloja L; Tabbara S; Thomas N; Winkler B; Tworek J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 23368860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sampling, sampling errors and specimen preparation.
Baandrup U; Bishop JW; Bonfiglio TA; Branca M; Hutchinson ML; Laverty CR; Ahmad J; Illescas LT; Obwegeser JH; Patnick J; Pogacnik A; Rosenthal DL; Suprun HZ; Verhest A; Richart RM
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 11127750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-house quality assurance program in a state cytology laboratory.
Gardner NM
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):487-8. PubMed ID: 2750439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An assessment of partial rescreening as an internal quality control method for cervical smears.
Johnson SJ; Hair T; Gibson L; Ridley B; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 1995 Dec; 6(6):376-87. PubMed ID: 8770539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Recommendations for quality control of cervico-vaginal cytology].
GISCi, Gruppo Italiano Screening del Cervicocarcinoma
Epidemiol Prev; 2004; 28(1 Suppl):1-16. PubMed ID: 15202448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of false negative Pap smears by rapid reviewing. A metaanalysis.
Arbyn M; Schenck U
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 11127751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of monitoring interpretive rates, concordance between cytotechnologist and pathologist interpretations before sign-out, and turnaround time in gynecologic cytology quality assurance: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 1.
Clary KM; Davey DD; Naryshkin S; Austin RM; Thomas N; Chmara BA; Sugrue C; Tworek J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 23368858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proficiency testing in laboratory medicine: uses and limitations.
Shahangian S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jan; 122(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 9448012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation and evaluation of a national external quality control program for cervical cytology in Mexico.
Flisser A; García-Malo F; Canepa Mde L; Doncel S; Espinoza R; Moreno R; Avila I; Pérez-Palacios G; Tapia-Conyer R; de la Fuente JR
Salud Publica Mex; 2002; 44(5):431-6. PubMed ID: 12389486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The cytology proficiency dilemma: the case for computer-based testing.
Quarngesser SS
Am Clin Lab; 1996; 15(10):18. PubMed ID: 10164049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in Cervical Cytology Screening and Reporting Practices: Results From the College of American Pathologists 2011 PAP Education Supplemental Questionnaire.
Crothers BA; Darragh TM; Tambouret RH; Nayar R; Barkan GA; Zhao C; Booth CN; Padmanabhan V; Tabatabai ZL; Souers RJ; Thomas N; Wilbur DC; Moriarty AT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 140(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 26046490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External quality assessment in gynaecological cytology: The Trent Region experience. The Trent Regional Gynaecological Pathology Quality Assurance Group for the National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme.
Slater DN; Hewer EM; Melling SE; Rice S
Cytopathology; 2002 Aug; 13(4):206-19. PubMed ID: 12269893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Re: the editorial in number 4, volume 28, 2008. "Cervical cancer control in Colombia: achievements and challenges of cytology based programs"].
Calvache AE
Biomedica; 2009 Mar; 29(1):161-2; author reply 162-3. PubMed ID: 19753849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. General quality practices in gynecologic cytopathology: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 3.
Tworek J; Nayar R; Savaloja L; Tabbara S; Thomas N; Winkler B; Howell LP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 23368861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Canadian experience in cytology proficiency testing.
Thompson DW
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):484-6. PubMed ID: 2546350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of reporting endocervical component adequacy--a continuous quality improvement project.
Roberson J; Connolly K; St John K; Eltoum I; Chhieng DC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12203868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
