116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11127750)
1. Sampling, sampling errors and specimen preparation.
Baandrup U; Bishop JW; Bonfiglio TA; Branca M; Hutchinson ML; Laverty CR; Ahmad J; Illescas LT; Obwegeser JH; Patnick J; Pogacnik A; Rosenthal DL; Suprun HZ; Verhest A; Richart RM
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 11127750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulatory closure of cervical cytology laboratories: recommendations for a public health response.
MMWR Recomm Rep; 1997 Dec; 46(RR-17):1-19. PubMed ID: 9409538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of false negative Pap smears by rapid reviewing. A metaanalysis.
Arbyn M; Schenck U
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 11127751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Homogeneous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep Processor.
Hutchinson ML; Isenstein LM; Goodman A; Hurley AA; Douglass KL; Mui KK; Patten FW; Zahniser DJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 8116578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct-to-vial use of the AutoCyte PREP liquid-based preparation for cervical-vaginal specimens in three European laboratories.
Vassilakos P; Saurel J; Rondez R
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 9987452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cancer screening from the public health perspective.
Steiner C
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):471-4. PubMed ID: 2750437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Papanicolaou smear histories of 237 patients with cervical cancer.
Grace J
Med J Aust; 1992 Sep; 157(5):353. PubMed ID: 1435485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality assurance in cervical cytology. The Papanicolaou smear. Council on Scientific Affairs.
JAMA; 1989 Sep 22-29; 262(12):1672-9. PubMed ID: 2671421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. HPV self-sampling or the Pap-smear: a randomized study among cervical screening nonattenders from lower socioeconomic groups in France.
Sancho-Garnier H; Tamalet C; Halfon P; Leandri FX; Le Retraite L; Djoufelkit K; Heid P; Davies P; Piana L
Int J Cancer; 2013 Dec; 133(11):2681-7. PubMed ID: 23712523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pap smears. Do them right and every year--forever!
Gall SA
Postgrad Med; 1989 May; 85(6):235-9. PubMed ID: 2710727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simplified and reliable HPV testing of archival Papanicolaou-stained cervical smears: application to cervical smears from cancer patients starting with cytologically normal smears.
Jacobs MV; Zielinski D; Meijer CJ; Pol RP; Voorhorst FJ; de Schipper FA; Runsink AP; Snijders PJ; Walboomers JM
Br J Cancer; 2000 Apr; 82(8):1421-6. PubMed ID: 10780521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pap smear quality parameters of 3 sampling devices used by auxiliary nurse midwives on symptomatic rural Indian women.
Rao L; Kamath VK; Boon ME; Valiathan M; Rao AC
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 15966285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Competency assessment and proficiency testing.
Davey DD; McGoogan E; Somrak TM; Allen KA; Beccati D; Cramer SF; Frable WJ; Hauser NJ; Hewer EM; Lestadi J; Lulla MK; O'Rourke D; Suprun HZ
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(6):939-43. PubMed ID: 11127749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of smear quality on the rate of detecting significant cervical cytologic abnormalities.
Henry JA; Wadehra V
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 8669190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation.
DeMay RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 9111106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size calculations for rescreening cytologic smears.
Nagy GK; Collins DN; Wilson TA
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):501-5. PubMed ID: 8669186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The pivotal role of the pathology laboratory in the context of a Singapore cervical cancer screening programme.
Chang AR
Singapore Med J; 2004 Jun; 45(6):257-66. PubMed ID: 15181519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The false-negative fraction: a statistical method to measure the efficacy of cervical smear screening laboratories.
Dolinar J; Ollayos CW; Tellado M; Ali I; Stevens A; Paquette C; Brodbelt S
Mil Med; 1999 Jun; 164(6):410-1. PubMed ID: 10377709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
