These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11127779)

  • 1. [Mammography screening: presentation of scientific evidence as a basis for communication with women].
    Mühlhauser I; Höldke B
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Oct; 94(9):721-31. PubMed ID: 11127779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Population screening for breast cancer by mammography in The Netherlands. Expectations, early results, negative effects and conditions for large-scale screening.
    Hendriks JH; Verbeek AL
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):186-91. PubMed ID: 3896616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Information on mammography screening--from deception to insight].
    Mühlhauser I; Höldke B
    Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 12063738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care.
    Tice JA; Kerlikowske K
    Prim Care; 2009 Sep; 36(3):533-58. PubMed ID: 19616154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: prospects for New Zealand.
    Skegg D; Paul C; Benson-Cooper D; Chetwynd J; Clarke A; Fitzgerald N; Gray A; St George I; Simpson A
    N Z Med J; 1988 Aug; 101(852):531-3. PubMed ID: 3045716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An approach to enhance communication about screening mammography in primary care.
    Nekhlyudov L; Braddock CH
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Sep; 18(9):1403-12. PubMed ID: 19708801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are there downsides to mammography screening?
    Baines CJ
    Breast J; 2005; 11 Suppl 1():S7-10. PubMed ID: 15725116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The costs and benefits of breast cancer screening.
    Miller AB
    Am J Prev Med; 1993; 9(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 8347369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Warner E
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 19(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 18941396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of effectiveness of quality-assured mammography screening in Germany: sample size considerations and design options.
    Becker N; Hakama M; Nyström L
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 17415093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
    Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Breast cancer].
    Fukuda M; Miyamoto K; Hashizume R; Okamoto J; Kawamoto H; Yabuki Y; Ogata H; Ohta T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2002 Nov; 29(11):1900-6. PubMed ID: 12465388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
    Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Screening lowers breast cancer mortality. Motivate your patients for mammography].
    Kessler M; Schneider P; Sittek H; Reiser M
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2001 Jul; 143(28-29):32-5. PubMed ID: 11499144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cancer screening: medico-legal aspects].
    Buzzi F
    Ann Ig; 2003; 15(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 12666320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of breast cancer secondary prevention activities and satisfaction with access and communication issues in women 50 and over.
    Roberts RA; Birch NJ
    Prev Med; 2001 Apr; 32(4):348-58. PubMed ID: 11304096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk benefit in mass screening programs for breast cancer.
    Miller AB
    Semin Oncol; 1978 Dec; 5(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 104389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors associated with repeat mammography screening.
    Halabi S; Skinner CS; Samsa GP; Strigo TS; Crawford YS; Rimer BK
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Dec; 49(12):1104-12. PubMed ID: 11132060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who receives, benefits from and is harmed by cervical and breast cancer screening among Hong Kong Chinese?
    Leung GM; Woo PP; Cowling BJ; Tsang CS; Cheung AN; Ngan HY; Galbraith K; Lam TH
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Sep; 30(3):282-92. PubMed ID: 18482996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.