BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11128314)

  • 1. Experimental evaluation of a simple algorithm to enhance the spatial resolution in scanned radiographic systems.
    Olivo A; Rigon L; Arfelli F; Cantatore G; Longo R; Menk RH; Pani S; Prest M; Poropat P; Tromba G; Vallazza E; Castelli E
    Med Phys; 2000 Nov; 27(11):2609-16. PubMed ID: 11128314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective assessment of image quality in conventional and digital mammography taking into account dynamic range.
    Pachoud M; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):380-2. PubMed ID: 15933141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
    McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-definition mapping of neural activity using voltage-sensitive dyes.
    Cinelli AR
    Methods; 2000 Aug; 21(4):349-72. PubMed ID: 10964579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
    Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
    Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Photon counting computed tomography: concept and initial results.
    Shikhaliev PM; Xu T; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):427-36. PubMed ID: 15789589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Workman A; Yip M; Wells K; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental evaluation and basis function optimization of the spatially variant image-space PSF on the Ingenuity PET/MR scanner.
    Kotasidis FA; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):062501. PubMed ID: 24877835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography.
    Ohkubo M; Wada S; Matsumoto T; Nishizawa K
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2757-64. PubMed ID: 16964851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of x-ray diffraction enhanced imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Liu C; Yan X; Zhang X; Yang W; Peng W; Shi D; Zhu P; Huang W; Yuan Q
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):419-27. PubMed ID: 17202624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AEC for scanning digital mammography based on variation of scan velocity.
    Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3367-74. PubMed ID: 16370424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deconvolution of x-ray phase contrast images as a way to retrieve phase information lost due to insufficient resolution.
    Olivo A; Speller RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):N347-54. PubMed ID: 19590117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A theoretical study on phase-contrast mammography with Thomson-scattering x-ray sources.
    De Caro L; Giannini C; Bellotti R; Tangaro S
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4644-53. PubMed ID: 19928096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Presampling, algorithm factors, and noise: considerations for CT in particular and for medical imaging in general.
    Kachelriess M; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1321-34. PubMed ID: 15984684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parallel-scanning tomosynthesis using a slot scanning technique: fixed-focus reconstruction and the resulting image quality.
    Shibata K; Notohara D; Sakai T
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111903. PubMed ID: 25370636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
    Van Ongeval Ch
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical performance and image optimization of megavoltage cone-beam CT.
    Morin O; Aubry JF; Aubin M; Chen J; Descovich M; Hashemi AB; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1421-32. PubMed ID: 19472649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.