381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11128779)
1. Physiological basis of flow dependence of Gorlin formula valve area in aortic stenosis: analysis using an hydraulic model of pulsatile flow.
Rifkin RD
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):740-51. PubMed ID: 11128779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modified gorlin equation for the diagnosis of mixed aortic valve pathology.
Scotten LN; Walker DK; Dutton JW
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):360-8; discussion 368. PubMed ID: 12056728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Doppler echocardiography determination of the orifice area in aortic valve stenosis using a continuity equation].
Dennig K; Kraus F; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Dec; 11(6):309-17. PubMed ID: 3817722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transaortic gradient is pressure-dependent in a pulsatile model of the circulation.
Razzolini R; Gerosa G; Leoni L; Casarotto D; Chioin R; Dalla-Volta S
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 May; 8(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 10399661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model.
Voelker W; Reul H; Nienhaus G; Stelzer T; Schmitz B; Steegers A; Karsch KR
Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1196-204. PubMed ID: 7850959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analytical modeling of the instantaneous maximal transvalvular pressure gradient in aortic stenosis.
Garcia D; Kadem L; Savéry D; Pibarot P; Durand LG
J Biomech; 2006; 39(16):3036-44. PubMed ID: 16307750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis.
Tardif JC; Rodrigues AG; Hardy JF; Leclerc Y; Petitclerc R; Mongrain R; Mercier LA
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 May; 29(6):1296-302. PubMed ID: 9137227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value and limitations of aortic valve resistance with particular consideration of low flow-low gradient aortic stenosis: an in vitro study.
Mascherbauer J; Schima H; Rosenhek R; Czerny M; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
Eur Heart J; 2004 May; 25(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 15120890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in valvular resistance, power dissipation and myocardial reserve with aortic valvuloplasty.
Feldman T; Ford LE; Chiu YC; Carroll JD
J Heart Valve Dis; 1992 Sep; 1(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 1341224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis.
Burwash IG; Thomas DD; Sadahiro M; Pearlman AS; Verrier ED; Thomas R; Kraft CD; Otto CM
Circulation; 1994 Feb; 89(2):827-35. PubMed ID: 8313572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro.
Mascherbauer J; Fuchs C; Stoiber M; Schima H; Pernicka E; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
Eur Heart J; 2008 Aug; 29(16):2049-57. PubMed ID: 18502739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analytical modeling of the instantaneous pressure gradient across the aortic valve.
Garcia D; Pibarot P; Durand LG
J Biomech; 2005 Jun; 38(6):1303-11. PubMed ID: 15863115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
Burwash IG; Dickinson A; Teskey RJ; Tam JW; Chan KL
Can J Cardiol; 2000 Aug; 16(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 10978934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of dobutamine on Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas and valve resistance in valvular aortic stenosis.
Casale PN; Palacios IF; Abascal VM; Harrell L; Davidoff R; Weyman AE; Fifer MA
Am J Cardiol; 1992 Nov; 70(13):1175-9. PubMed ID: 1414942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of valve resistance, the continuity equation, and the Gorlin formula against directly observed orifice area in bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position: an in vitro study.
Chambers JB; Wang Z; Cooke RA; Black MM
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Mar; 5(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 8665004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the seriousness of aortic valve stenosis: calculation of the valvular area or peak? Reliability of Hakki's formula].
Mazzantini S; Miccoli F; Vischi M; Rubartelli P; Abbadessa F; Della Rovere F
G Ital Cardiol; 1985 May; 15(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 4054487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of pressure recovery location in aortic valve stenosis: an in-vitro validation study.
Rhodes KD; Stroml JA; Rahman MM; VanAuker MD
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Sep; 16(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 17944120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Differentiated evaluation of heart valve stenosis by expanded Bernoulli equation--in vitro studies of model stenoses].
Wendt MO; Pohl M; Werner S; Kühnel R; Toppel D
Z Kardiol; 1995 Sep; 84(9):686-93. PubMed ID: 8525670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative determination of the aortic valve area (Gorlin) by flowmetry.
Larmi TK; Kärkölä P; Kairaluoma MI; Tuononen S; Nuutinen L; Takkunen J
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1977; 66(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 869483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. B-type natriuretic peptide in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: relationship to hemodynamics and clinical outcome: results from the Multicenter Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis (TOPAS) study.
Bergler-Klein J; Mundigler G; Pibarot P; Burwash IG; Dumesnil JG; Blais C; Fuchs C; Mohty D; Beanlands RS; Hachicha Z; Walter-Publig N; Rader F; Baumgartner H
Circulation; 2007 Jun; 115(22):2848-55. PubMed ID: 17515464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
