326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11128790)
1. Malfunction of a Hancock bioprosthesis in the mitral position 24 years after initial implantation.
Niinami H; Naito Y; Koyanagi H; Nagashima H; Kasanuki H
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):810-2. PubMed ID: 11128790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A case report: Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis malfunction due to the stent dehiscence at 17 years after the implantation in the mitral position].
Hayashi K; Nakano H; Sakamoto T; Okamura H
Kyobu Geka; 2000 Jan; 53(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 10639799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Findings of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position with PTF in the 16th post-operative year].
Matsuzaki K; Koishizawa T; Hiramatsu Y
Kyobu Geka; 1997 Oct; 50(11):950-3. PubMed ID: 9330518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Structural changes of Hancock bioprostheses in children (author's transl)].
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Callucci V; Valente M; Del Maschio A; Valfrè C; Thiene G
G Ital Cardiol; 1980; 10(11):1520-5. PubMed ID: 7202899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Twenty-eight-year survival of stent-mounted aortic homograft in the mitral position: case report.
Subramaniam G; Chowdhury UK; Seth S; Prusty S; Kumar AS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):559-62. PubMed ID: 16116885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unexpected long durability of a low-profile porcine Liotta bioprosthesis in mitral position.
Campanella A; Comoglio C; Sansone F; Rinaldi M
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2009 Jun; 10(6):492-3. PubMed ID: 19346969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Re-operation of a mitral porcine bioprosthesis 22-years after implantation].
Soeda M; Hata H; Iida M; Kimura H
Kyobu Geka; 2009 Feb; 62(2):149-51. PubMed ID: 19202937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A case of bioprosthetic mitral valvular dysfunction due to pannus-formation].
Takagi H; Terada Y; Shimoyama Y; Ino T; Wanibuchi Y; Furuta S
Kyobu Geka; 1990 Jul; 43(7):569-72. PubMed ID: 2395253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mitral valve re-replacement for impaired bioprosthesis after 19 years in a patient undergoing steroid treatment.
Shimazaki Y; Kuraoka S; Takeda F; Watanabe T; Inui K
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jan; 12(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 12578334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structural valvular deterioration of Hancock standard valve in the mitral position 33 years after initial implantation.
Saisho H; Tayama K; Shimoishi K; Hori H; Okazaki T
J Artif Organs; 2016 Dec; 19(4):408-410. PubMed ID: 27165606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-lasting durability of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bovine bioprosthesis in mitral position - a case report of unfavourable post redo valve surgery course.
Luczak K; Piestrzeniewicz K; Maciejewski M; Walczak A; Jaszewski R; Ostrowski S; Drozdz J
Kardiol Pol; 2010 Jul; 68(7):806-8; discussion 809. PubMed ID: 20648442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structural deterioration of the Freestyle aortic valve: mode of presentation and mechanisms.
Mohammadi S; Baillot R; Voisine P; Mathieu P; Dagenais F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 16872969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of pannus in the longevity of an Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis.
Butany JW; Kesarwani R; Yau TM; Singh G; Thangaroopan M; Nair V; Leong SW
J Card Surg; 2006; 21(5):505-7. PubMed ID: 16948773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Valve-in-valve replacement of primary tissue valve failure of bovine pericardial valve minor].
Tateishi M; Koide M; Kunii Y; Watanabe K; Ohsawa M
Kyobu Geka; 2006 Jan; 59(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 16440687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
Borger MA; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Christie-Hrybinsky D; Feindel CM; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):49-55; discussion 55-6. PubMed ID: 16480012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
