These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
65. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the new Mitroflow 12A pericardial bioprosthesis. García-Bengochea J; Sierra J; González-Juanatey JR; Rubio J; Vega M; Fernández AL; Sánchez D J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May; 15(3):446-51; discussion 451-2. PubMed ID: 16784087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Clinical outcomes with the Hancock II bioprosthetic valve. Masters RG; Haddad M; Pipe AL; Veinot JP; Mesana T Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Sep; 78(3):832-6. PubMed ID: 15337001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position. Daebritz SH; Fausten B; Hermanns B; Schroeder J; Groetzner J; Autschbach R; Messmer BJ; Sachweh JS Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 15144993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. [Reoperation for a Starr-Edwards ball valve prosthesis implanted in mitral position 31 years ago]. Goshima M; Shiono M; Yamamoto T; Inoue T; Hata M; Sezai A; Niino T; Nakamura T; Ye Z; Negishi N; Sezai Y Kyobu Geka; 2003 Jul; 56(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 12854458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population. Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. [Mitral valve re-replacement in a patient with occlusion of the left internal carotid artery]. Yoshikai M; Kamohara K; Yunoki J; Fumoto H Kyobu Geka; 2004 Jan; 57(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 14733104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Freedom from structural valve deterioration among patients aged < or = 60 years undergoing Freestyle stentless aortic valve replacement. Bach DS; Metras J; Doty JR; Yun KL; Dumesnil JG; Kon ND J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Nov; 16(6):649-55; discussion 656. PubMed ID: 18095515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Structural valve deterioration of a mitral Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in an 87-year-old woman 16 years after its implantation. Ito H; Sakata K; Haruki T; Kobayashi Y J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jul; 6():88. PubMed ID: 21729285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Unusual 25-year durability of an Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis. Fiore A; Cooley DA; Grande AM; Viganò M; Angelini P Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Apr; 91(4):e52-3. PubMed ID: 21440107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The case of an explanted 16-year-old mitral Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis. Murayama H; Watanabe T; Yano T; Kida N; Hatano Y; Ohara K; Kobayashi A J Artif Organs; 2006; 9(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 17171405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Cicatricial changes in a Ionescu-Shiley bioprosthesis. Walley VM; Stinson WA; Bedard P J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):690-1. PubMed ID: 8000615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Prosthetic mitral leaflet malfunction due to inappropriate size of implant. Ng YT; Chung PC; Lau WM Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2008 Jun; 46(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 18593653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Fatigue-induced failure of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft in the mitral position. In vivo and in vitro correlation and a proposed classification. Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Wasserman F; Factor S; Strom J; Frater RW J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jun; 87(6):836-44. PubMed ID: 6727407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]