184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11129184)
1. Osteochondral reconstruction of a non-weight-bearing joint using a high-density porous polyethylene implant.
Weinzweig J; Pantaloni M; Spangenberger A; Marler J; Zienowicz RJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Dec; 106(7):1547-54. PubMed ID: 11129184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Porous bioactive glass matrix in reconstruction of articular osteochondral defects.
Ylänen HO; Helminen T; Helminen A; Rantakokko J; Karlsson KH; Aro HT
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1999; 88(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 10532567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Agili-C implant promotes the regenerative capacity of articular cartilage defects in an ex vivo model.
Chubinskaya S; Di Matteo B; Lovato L; Iacono F; Robinson D; Kon E
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Jun; 27(6):1953-1964. PubMed ID: 30387000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Humeral resurfacing arthroplasty: rationale, indications, technique, and results.
Jensen KL
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Dec; 36(12 Suppl 1):4-8. PubMed ID: 18264550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repair of porcine articular cartilage defect with a biphasic osteochondral composite.
Jiang CC; Chiang H; Liao CJ; Lin YJ; Kuo TF; Shieh CS; Huang YY; Tuan RS
J Orthop Res; 2007 Oct; 25(10):1277-90. PubMed ID: 17576624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The repair response to osteochondral implant types in a rabbit model.
Frenkel SR; Kubiak EN; Truncale KG
Cell Tissue Bank; 2006; 7(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 16511662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety of, and biological and functional response to, a novel metallic implant for the management of focal full-thickness cartilage defects: Preliminary assessment in an animal model out to 1 year.
Kirker-Head CA; Van Sickle DC; Ek SW; McCool JC
J Orthop Res; 2006 May; 24(5):1095-108. PubMed ID: 16609973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of artificial articular cartilage.
Oka M; Ushio K; Kumar P; Ikeuchi K; Hyon SH; Nakamura T; Fujita H
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 10718051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the Anatomic Neck as an Accurate Landmark for Humeral Head Resurfacing Implant Height Placement.
Chen EJ; Simovitch R; Savoie F; Noel CR
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S28-32. PubMed ID: 26631192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spontaneous repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage in a goat model. A preliminary study.
Jackson DW; Lalor PA; Aberman HM; Simon TM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Jan; 83(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 11205859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Repairing porcine knee joint osteochondral defects at non-weight bearing area by autologous BMSC].
Zhou GD; Wang XY; Miao CL; Liu TY; Zhu L; Liu DL; Cui L; Liu W; Cao YL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jun; 84(11):925-31. PubMed ID: 15329281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation.
Buckwalter JA; Mankin HJ
Instr Course Lect; 1998; 47():487-504. PubMed ID: 9571450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of glenohumeral contact pressures and contact areas after posterior glenoid reconstruction with an iliac crest bone graft or distal tibial osteochondral allograft.
Frank RM; Shin J; Saccomanno MF; Bhatia S; Shewman E; Bach BR; Wang VM; Cole BJ; Provencher MT; Verma NN; Romeo AA
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Nov; 42(11):2574-82. PubMed ID: 25193887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Craniofacial augmentation with porous polyethylene implants (Medpor: first clinical results].
Gosau M; Schiel S; Draenert GF; Ihrler S; Mast G; Ehrenfeld M
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2006 May; 10(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 16685567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Matrix generation within a macroporous non-degradable implant for osteochondral defects is not enhanced with partial enzymatic digestion of the surrounding tissue: evaluation in an in vivo rabbit model.
Krych AJ; Wanivenhaus F; Ng KW; Doty S; Warren RF; Maher SA
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2013 Oct; 24(10):2429-37. PubMed ID: 23846837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cartilaginous extracellular matrix derived from decellularized chondrocyte sheets for the reconstruction of osteochondral defects in rabbits.
Wang Z; Li Z; Li Z; Wu B; Liu Y; Wu W
Acta Biomater; 2018 Nov; 81():129-145. PubMed ID: 30300711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanically stimulated osteochondral organ culture for evaluation of biomaterials in cartilage repair studies.
Vainieri ML; Wahl D; Alini M; van Osch GJVM; Grad S
Acta Biomater; 2018 Nov; 81():256-266. PubMed ID: 30273741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osteoconductivity of porous polyethylene in human skull.
Tark WH; Yoon IS; Rah DK; Park BY; Kim YO
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 22337379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biological and functional evaluation of a novel pyrolytic carbon implant for the treatment of focal osteochondral defects in the medial femoral condyle: assessment in a canine model.
Salkeld SL; Patron LP; Lien JC; Cook SD; Jones DG
J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 11(1):155. PubMed ID: 27906096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment of osteochondral defects: chondrointegration of metal implants improves after hydroxyapatite coating.
Schell H; Zimpfer E; Schmidt-Bleek K; Jung T; Duda GN; Ryd L
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Nov; 27(11):3575-3582. PubMed ID: 30879107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
