BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11129420)

  • 1. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MRI: accuracy and clinical usefulness.
    Kim NK; Kim MJ; Park JK; Park SI; Min JS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2000 Dec; 7(10):732-7. PubMed ID: 11129420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.
    Torricelli P; Lo Russo S; Pecchi A; Luppi G; Cesinaro AM; Romagnoli R
    Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11859303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Kim NK; Kim MJ; Yun SH; Sohn SK; Min JS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1999 Jun; 42(6):770-5. PubMed ID: 10378601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative study of endorectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer].
    Guo F; Ren J; Wang S; Dai W; Ma N
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 May; 94(17):1318-21. PubMed ID: 25142852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Diagnostic value of 3.0-tesla high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for invasion depth of rectal cancer].
    Yao X; Song X; Wang Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):668-74. PubMed ID: 27353102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution MRI for assessment mesorectal lymph node metastases in patients with rectal cancer].
    Chen Y; Yang X; Lu B; Xiao X; Zhuang X; Yu S
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):786-792. PubMed ID: 30051447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography.
    Chun HK; Choi D; Kim MJ; Lee J; Yun SH; Kim SH; Lee SJ; Kim CK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1557-62. PubMed ID: 17114550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
    Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A
    Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of Preoperative MRI to Select Candidates for Local Excision of MRI-Staged T1 and T2 Rectal Cancer: Can MRI Select Patients With N0 Tumors?
    An C; Huh H; Han KH; Kim MJ; Kim NK; Kim H; Lim JS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Oct; 58(10):923-30. PubMed ID: 26347963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study of endorectal ultrasonography in the staging of rectal cancer.
    Ren JH; Guo FJ; Dai WD; Han XJ; Ma N
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Oct; 125(20):3740-3. PubMed ID: 23075735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
    Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The value of endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging].
    Radovanović Z; Radovanović D; Breberina M; Petrović T; Golubović A; Bokorov B
    Med Pregl; 2008; 61(11-12):557-61. PubMed ID: 19368271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gadolinium enhanced endorectal coil and air enema magnetic resonance imaging as a useful tool in the preoperative examination of patients with rectal carcinoma.
    Matsuoka H; Masaki T; Sugiyama M; Nakamura A; Takahara T; Hachiya J; Atomi Y
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(55):131-5. PubMed ID: 15011848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Akasu T; Iinuma G; Takawa M; Yamamoto S; Muramatsu Y; Moriyama N
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):2787-94. PubMed ID: 19618244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with external phase-arrayed coils.
    Gagliardi G; Bayar S; Smith R; Salem RR
    Arch Surg; 2002 Apr; 137(4):447-51. PubMed ID: 11926950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of pathological stage and circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer].
    Jiang JB; Dai Y; Zhang XM; Li CF; Jin ZT; Bi DS; Sun JZ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 86(14):961-4. PubMed ID: 16759535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ability of phased-array MRI in preoperative staging of primary rectal cancer: correlation with histopathological results.
    Karatağ O; Karatağ GY; Özkurt H; Değirmenci HK; Avlanmış Ö; Başak M; Baykan A
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2012; 18(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21671218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Local staging of rectal cancer using combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coil MRI.
    Tatli S; Mortele KJ; Breen EL; Bleday R; Silverman SG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 16523466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative magnetic resonance staging of rectal cancer with an endorectal coil and dynamic gadolinium enhancement.
    Drew PJ; Farouk R; Turnbull LW; Ward SC; Hartley JE; Monson JR
    Br J Surg; 1999 Feb; 86(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 10100797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endorectal ultrasonography versus phased-array magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Halefoglu AM; Yildirim S; Avlanmis O; Sakiz D; Baykan A
    World J Gastroenterol; 2008 Jun; 14(22):3504-10. PubMed ID: 18567078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.