These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11129490)

  • 21. Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical analysis.
    Greenland S
    Epidemiology; 1995 Jul; 6(4):356-65. PubMed ID: 7548341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimating data transformations in nonlinear mixed effects models.
    Oberg A; Davidian M
    Biometrics; 2000 Mar; 56(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 10783778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Model selection in estimating equations.
    Pan W
    Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):529-34. PubMed ID: 11414579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. geecure: An R-package for marginal proportional hazards mixture cure models.
    Niu Y; Wang X; Peng Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 161():115-124. PubMed ID: 29852954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Summarizing EC50 estimates from multiple dose-response experiments: a comparison of a meta-analysis strategy to a mixed-effects model approach.
    Jiang X; Kopp-Schneider A
    Biom J; 2014 May; 56(3):493-512. PubMed ID: 24478144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Generalized estimating equations for ordinal data: a note on working correlation structures.
    Lumley T
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):354-61. PubMed ID: 8934602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Segregation analysis of case-control data using generalized estimating equations.
    Whittemore AS; Gong G
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1073-87. PubMed ID: 7786989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tolerance limits and tolerance intervals for ratios of normal random variables using a bootstrap calibration.
    Flouri M; Zhai S; Mathew T; Bebu I
    Biom J; 2017 May; 59(3):550-566. PubMed ID: 28181281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multivariate extensions of McNemar's test.
    Klingenberg B; Agresti A
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):921-8. PubMed ID: 16984337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The analysis of longitudinal polytomous data: generalized estimating equations and connections with weighted least squares.
    Miller ME; Davis CS; Landis JR
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1033-44. PubMed ID: 8117899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimating the species accumulation curve using mixtures.
    Mao CX; Colwell RK; Chang J
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):433-41. PubMed ID: 16011689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A model-based initial guess for estimating parameters in systems of ordinary differential equations.
    Dattner I
    Biometrics; 2015 Dec; 71(4):1176-84. PubMed ID: 26172865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of three methods for calculating confidence intervals for the benchmark dose.
    Moerbeek M; Piersma AH; Slob W
    Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 15027998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. PHARMFIT--a nonlinear fitting program for pharmacology.
    Mattes A; Witte K; Hohmann W; Lemmer B
    Chronobiol Int; 1991; 8(6):460-76. PubMed ID: 1799928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bayesian semiparametric analysis of developmental toxicology data.
    Dominici F; Parmigiani G
    Biometrics; 2001 Mar; 57(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 11252591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A note on the bias of estimators with missing data.
    Rotnitzky A; Wypij D
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1163-70. PubMed ID: 7786998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative study of R functions for clustered data analysis.
    Wang W; Harhay MO
    Trials; 2021 Dec; 22(1):959. PubMed ID: 34961539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of two approaches to analyzing correlated binary data in developmental toxicity studies.
    Ten Have TR; Hartzel T
    Teratology; 1995 Nov; 52(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 8838250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Profile likelihood-based confidence interval of the intraclass correlation for binary outcome data sampled from clusters.
    Saha KK
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3982-4002. PubMed ID: 22826179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.