229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11130036)
1. NIH cash tied to compulsory training in good behaviour.
Dalton R
Nature; 2000 Dec; 408(6813):629. PubMed ID: 11130036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Zerhouni proposes major changes to NIH ethics program.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Jul; 96(14):1057. PubMed ID: 15265963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. NIH forms policy centre to study research ethics.
Mervis J
Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6368):367. PubMed ID: 1557111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stealth merger: drug companies and government medical research.
Willman D
Los Angeles Times; 2003 Dec; ():A1, A32-3. PubMed ID: 14971391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
United States
US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Restoring trust through bioethics education?
Salerno JA
Acad Med; 2008 Jun; 83(6):532-4. PubMed ID: 18520453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in NIH review procedures: strengths and weaknesses.
Adler KB; Abraham E
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol; 2009 Aug; 41(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 19620406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. AAMC Task Force issues first Financial Conflict of Interest Guidelines, and GAO urges HHS to reexamine financial conflict of interest guidance and regulations for NIH-funded research. Association of American Medical Colleges. U.S. General Accounting Office. Department of Health and Human Services.
J Investig Med; 2002 Mar; 50(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 11928944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of the current regulatory environment on clinical research: An overview.
Finlayson SR
Surgery; 2009 Jun; 145(6):626-30. PubMed ID: 19486763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The NIH and bioethics: what should be done?
Emanuel E
Acad Med; 2008 Jun; 83(6):529-31. PubMed ID: 18520451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The curious saga of Congress, the NIH, and conflict of interest.
Crigger BJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 15957312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Subverting U.S. health.
Los Angeles Times; 2003 Dec; ():M4. PubMed ID: 14971390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review at NIH: a conversation with CSR director Toni Scarpa.
Scarpa T
Physiologist; 2010 Jun; 53(3):65, 67-9. PubMed ID: 20550006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. NIH roadmap: course change for the big ship.
Pentecost MJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Apr; 1(4):239-40. PubMed ID: 17411571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomedical policy. Bush squeezes between the lines on stem cells.
Vogel G
Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5533):1242-5. PubMed ID: 11509703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Growing pains for NIH grant review.
Bonetta L
Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Research ethics. Studies trace patchwork of conflict policies.
Agnew B
Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5498):1873. PubMed ID: 11187038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Curb your enthusiasm.
Laurence J
Transl Res; 2007 Jul; 150(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17585858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
Mervis J
Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. PLOS position on NIH public access policy.
Gass A; Doyle H
Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5720):356. PubMed ID: 15831740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
