These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11130095)

  • 1. Comparison between personal learning curves for abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Leminen A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Dec; 79(12):1100-4. PubMed ID: 11130095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a comparative study.
    Vaisbuch E; Goldchmit C; Ofer D; Agmon A; Hagay Z
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jun; 126(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 16616408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A review of 445 cases of laparoscopic hysterectomy: benefits and outcome].
    Malzoni M; Perniola G; Hannuna K; Iuele T; Fruscella ML; Basili R; Ebano V; Marziani R
    Clin Ter; 2004 Jan; 155(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 15147074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of surgeon's experience on the surgical outcome of laparoscopic surgery for women with endometrial cancer.
    Eltabbakh GH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jul; 78(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 10873411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
    Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures.
    Donnez O; Jadoul P; Squifflet J; Donnez J
    BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):492-500. PubMed ID: 19016683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Frumovitz M; dos Reis R; Sun CC; Milam MR; Bevers MW; Brown J; Slomovitz BM; Ramirez PT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 17601902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomies with conventional hysterectomies.
    Abdollahi SF; Bahlouli A; Mostafa PG; Rasooli S; Morteza G
    Saudi Med J; 2009 Jun; 30(6):813-6. PubMed ID: 19526166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
    Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study.
    Härkki-Sirén P; Sjöberg J; Toivonen J; Tiitinen A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Oct; 79(10):866-71. PubMed ID: 11304971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
    Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience.
    Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes T
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 17980332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
    Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
    Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a 5-year experience.
    Ng CC; Chern BS
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Dec; 276(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 17508217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with retroperitoneal uterine artery sealing using LigaSure: Gazi hospital experience.
    Gol M; Kizilyar A; Eminoglu M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Oct; 276(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 17372751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.