BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11130106)

  • 1. The effect of task on determination of habitual pitch.
    Zraick RI; Skaggs SD; Montague JC
    J Voice; 2000 Dec; 14(4):484-9. PubMed ID: 11130106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of speaking sample duration on determination of habitual pitch.
    Zraick RI; Birdwell KY; Smith-Olinde L
    J Voice; 2005 Jun; 19(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 15907434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of task on determination of habitual loudness.
    Zraick RI; Marshall W; Smith-Olinde L; Montague JC
    J Voice; 2004 Jun; 18(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 15193650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of speaking context on elicitation of habitual pitch.
    Zraick RI; Gentry MA; Smith-Olinde L; Gregg BA
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):545-54. PubMed ID: 16274957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of Speech Fundamental Frequencies for Different Tasks in Japanese.
    Sotome T; Kanazawa T; Konomi U; Maeara N; Misawa K; Takahashi S; Fukaura J; Watanabe Y
    J Voice; 2023 Mar; 37(2):299.e1-299.e8. PubMed ID: 33455851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of task on determination of maximum phonational frequency range.
    Zraick RI; Nelson JL; Montague JC; Monoson PK
    J Voice; 2000 Jun; 14(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 10875566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of habitual pitch during free play activities for preschool-aged children.
    Chen Y; Kimelman MD; Micco K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jan; 73(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 18996604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Average speaking fundamental frequency in soprano singers with and without symptoms of vocal attrition.
    Drew R; Sapir S
    J Voice; 1995 Jun; 9(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 7620535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonational profiles of female professional singers and nonsingers.
    Brown WS; Morris RJ; Hicks DM; Howell E
    J Voice; 1993 Sep; 7(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 8353639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mid-basal-to-ceiling versus mid-ceiling-to-basal elicitation of maximum phonational frequency range.
    Zraick RI; Keyes MP; Montague JC; Keiser JH
    J Voice; 2002 Sep; 16(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 12395984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of habitual and derived optimal voice fundamental frequency values in normal young adult speakers.
    Britto AI; Doyle PC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 Aug; 55(3):476-84. PubMed ID: 2381189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
    Lu FL; Matteson S
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech task effects on acoustic measure of fundamental frequency in Cantonese-speaking children.
    Ma EP; Lam NL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2260-4. PubMed ID: 26586246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effects of different tasks on determination of the speaking fundamental frequency].
    Barsties B
    HNO; 2013 Jul; 61(7):609-16. PubMed ID: 23371051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revisiting the pitch controversy: changes in speaking fundamental frequency (SFF) after management of functional dysphonia.
    Roy N; Hendarto H
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):582-91. PubMed ID: 16301104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice.
    Zraick RI; Wendel K; Smith-Olinde L
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):574-81. PubMed ID: 16301103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. F
    Gunasekaran N; Boominathan P; Seethapathy J
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):255.e9-255.e17. PubMed ID: 29287684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reading and spontaneous speaking fundamental frequency of young Arabic men for Arabic and English languages: a comparative study.
    Abu-Al-makarem A; Petrosino L
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Oct; 105(2):572-80. PubMed ID: 18065081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual judgment of voice pitch during pitch-matching tasks.
    Schueller M; Fucci D; Bond ZS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Jun; 94(3 Pt 1):967-74. PubMed ID: 12081301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of acoustic and perceptual measures of voice in male-to-female transsexuals perceived as female versus those perceived as male.
    Gelfer MP; Schofield KJ
    J Voice; 2000 Mar; 14(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 10764114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.