These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11130268)

  • 21. Awareness and understanding of occupational exposure limits in Sweden.
    Schenk L
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Apr; 65(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 23376473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Suitability of the limit dose in evaluating reproductive toxicity of substances and preparations.
    Schneider K; Oltmanns J; Van Gelder R; Gebel T
    Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26(3):183-95. PubMed ID: 17564899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Japan.
    Takahashi K; Higashi T
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 16510222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].
    Li W; Zhang M; Wang D
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 24428986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Neurobehavioral tests as a medical surveillance procedure: applying evaluative criteria.
    Guirguis S
    Environ Res; 1997; 73(1-2):63-9. PubMed ID: 9311531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neurobehavioral testing of chemicals: impact on recommended standards.
    Anger WK
    Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol; 1984; 6(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 6472559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative property-property relationships for computing occupational exposure limits and vapour hazard ratios of organic solvents.
    Debia M; Krishnan K
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):583-601. PubMed ID: 21120751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of concentration-response options for diacetyl in support of occupational risk assessment.
    Maier A; Kohrman-Vincent M; Parker A; Haber LT
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):285-96. PubMed ID: 20600455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Benzene exposure in the shoemaking industry in China, a literature survey, 1978-2004.
    Wang L; Zhou Y; Liang Y; Wong O; Armstrong T; Schnatter AR; Wu Q; Fang J; Ye X; Fu H; Irons RD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 16989927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of REACH-derived no-effect levels for workers with EU indicative occupational exposure limit values and national limit values in Finland.
    Tynkkynen S; Santonen T; Stockmann-Juvala H
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 25638729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of reliability of traditional and computerized neurobehavioral tests.
    Sakong J; Kang PS; Kim CY; Hwang TY; Jeon MJ; Park SY; Lee SJ; Won KC; Lee SB; Chung JH
    Neurotoxicology; 2007 Mar; 28(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 16620994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An occupational hygiene investigation of exposure to acrylamide and the role for urinary S-carboxyethyl-cysteine (CEC) as a biological marker.
    Bull PJ; Brooke RK; Cocker J; Jones K; Warren N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Nov; 49(8):683-90. PubMed ID: 16141254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A quantitative comparison of the safety margins in the european indicative occupational exposure limits and the derived no-effect levels for workers under REACH.
    Schenk L; Johanson G
    Toxicol Sci; 2011 Jun; 121(2):408-16. PubMed ID: 21389111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. From neurotoxic to chemosensory effects: new insights on acute solvent neurotoxicity exemplified by acute effects of 2-ethylhexanol.
    van Thriel C; Kiesswetter E; Schäper M; Blaszkewicz M; Golka K; Juran S; Kleinbeck S; Seeber A
    Neurotoxicology; 2007 Mar; 28(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 16712936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Polyisocyanates in occupational environments: a critical review of exposure limits and metrics.
    Bello D; Woskie SR; Streicher RP; Liu Y; Stowe MH; Eisen EA; Ellenbecker MJ; Sparer J; Youngs F; Cullen MR; Redlich CA
    Am J Ind Med; 2004 Nov; 46(5):480-91. PubMed ID: 15490474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neurotoxic syndromes and occupational exposure to solvents.
    Juntunen J
    Environ Res; 1993 Jan; 60(1):98-111. PubMed ID: 8432268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A scoping survey of attitudes towards occupational exposure limits and REACH derived no effect levels for workers among chemical risk managers at Swedish workplaces.
    Schenk L
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2020 Sep; 33(5):611-620. PubMed ID: 32699425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the neurotoxic potential of chemicals--a multidisciplinary approach.
    Becking GC; Boyes WK; Damstra T; MacPhail RC
    Environ Res; 1993 Apr; 61(1):164-75. PubMed ID: 8472671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The development of occupational exposure limits for chemical substances in China.
    Liang YX; Gang BQ; Gu XQ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Oct; 22(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 8577951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.