427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11130706)
1. Illusions. What you see is what you hear.
Shams L; Kamitani Y; Shimojo S
Nature; 2000 Dec; 408(6814):788. PubMed ID: 11130706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Correlation between individual features of the functional asymmetry of the cerebral hemispheres and pilot success].
Giurdzhian AA; Fedoruk AG
Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med; 1982; 16(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 7062698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What does the illusory-flash look like?
McCormick D; Mamassian P
Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 18054372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural latencies do not explain the auditory and audio-visual flash-lag effect.
Arrighi R; Alais D; Burr D
Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(23):2917-25. PubMed ID: 16115662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural basis of the ventriloquist illusion.
Bonath B; Noesselt T; Martinez A; Mishra J; Schwiecker K; Heinze HJ; Hillyard SA
Curr Biol; 2007 Oct; 17(19):1697-703. PubMed ID: 17884498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The one-is-more illusion: Sets of discrete objects appear less extended than equivalent continuous entities in both space and time.
Yousif SR; Scholl BJ
Cognition; 2019 Apr; 185():121-130. PubMed ID: 30682713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On perceived synchrony-neural dynamics of audiovisual illusions and suppressions.
Noesselt T; Bonath B; Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():132-41. PubMed ID: 17956754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two and three dimensional figure reversals [proceedings].
Radilová J; Radil-Weiss T
Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1977 Sep; 19(3):198-9. PubMed ID: 920081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of Helmholtz-Hering illusion by a multi-channel model].
Morita T; Fujii K; Matsuoka A
Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1983 Apr; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 6655999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Magic and fixation: now you don't see it, now you do.
Kuhn G; Tatler BW
Perception; 2005; 34(9):1155-61. PubMed ID: 16245492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Illusions, perception and Bayes.
Geisler WS; Kersten D
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Jun; 5(6):508-10. PubMed ID: 12037517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Delusions about illusions.
Rogers B
Perception; 2014; 43(9):840-5. PubMed ID: 25420325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Little-used medical technology could help thousands see, hear and feel better.
Bateman C
S Afr Med J; 2015 Apr; 105(5):334-6. PubMed ID: 26242655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Theory versus speculation in visual perception.
Grossberg S
Perception; 2001; 30(12):1505-7. PubMed ID: 11817758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception of the auditory-visual illusion in speech perception by children with phonological disorders.
Dodd B; McIntosh B; Erdener D; Burnham D
Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Jan; 22(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 18092221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Complex visual hallucinations following occipital infarct and perception of optical illusions].
Renou P; Deltour S; Samson Y
Rev Neurol (Paris); 2008 May; 164(5):481-5. PubMed ID: 18555883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing audiovisual fission and fusion illusions.
Andersen TS; Tiippana K; Sams M
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 15511646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conscious access to the unisensory components of a cross-modal illusion.
Soto-Faraco S; Alsius A
Neuroreport; 2007 Mar; 18(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 17435600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory and visual attention-based apparent motion share functional parallels.
Huddleston WE; Lewis JW; Phinney RE; DeYoe EA
Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1207-16. PubMed ID: 18927004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Thatcher illusion: now you see it, now you don't.
Rhodes G; Jeffery L
Perception; 2009; 38(6):927-9; discussion 931-2. PubMed ID: 19806992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
