These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11131051)

  • 41. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Practice Patterns Following 2011 FDA Approval: A Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists.
    Gao Y; Babb JS; Toth HK; Moy L; Heller SL
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):947-953. PubMed ID: 28188043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Community attitudes and mammography use: does it really matter what other people think?
    Andersen MR; Urban N; Etzioni R
    Women Health; 1999; 29(3):83-95. PubMed ID: 10466512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. When the patient asks for the results of her mammogram, how should the radiologist reply?
    Hoffman NY; Janus J; Destounis S; Logan-Young W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):597-9. PubMed ID: 8109504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Examining screening mammography participation among women aged 40 to 74.
    Volesky KD; Villeneuve PJ
    Can Fam Physician; 2017 Jun; 63(6):e300-e309. PubMed ID: 28615408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Women's Behaviors Toward Mammogram and Pap Test: Opportunities to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Participation Rates among Older Women.
    Tavasoli SM; Kane E; Chiarelli AM; Kupets R
    Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 29174212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Mammography-related beliefs of older women. A survey of an HMO population.
    King E; Rimer BK; Balshem A; Ross E; Seay J
    J Aging Health; 1993 Feb; 5(1):82-100. PubMed ID: 10123496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Women's understanding of the mammography screening debate.
    Woloshin S; Schwartz LM; Byram SJ; Sox HC; Fischhoff B; Welch HG
    Arch Intern Med; 2000 May; 160(10):1434-40. PubMed ID: 10826455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Women's satisfaction with mammography and predictors of participation in an organized breast cancer screening program: Perspectives of a Local Health Unit in Rome.
    Unim B; Boggi R; Napoli M; Fulgenzi R; Landi A; La Torre G
    Public Health; 2018 Feb; 155():91-94. PubMed ID: 29331770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A health priorities model: application to mammography screening.
    Meischke H; Andersen R; Bowen D; Kuniyuki A; Urban N
    Health Educ Behav; 1998 Jun; 25(3):383-95. PubMed ID: 9615246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cancer screening in women: body mass index and adherence to physician recommendations.
    Ferrante JM; Chen PH; Crabtree BF; Wartenberg D
    Am J Prev Med; 2007 Jun; 32(6):525-31. PubMed ID: 17533069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mammography decision making: Trends and predictors of provider communication in the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2011 to 2014.
    Spring LM; Marshall MR; Warner ET
    Cancer; 2017 Feb; 123(3):401-409. PubMed ID: 27727457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Barriers to mammography among inadequately screened women.
    Stoll CR; Roberts S; Cheng MR; Crayton EV; Jackson S; Politi MC
    Health Educ Behav; 2015 Feb; 42(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 24722216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mammography decision making in older women with a breast cancer family history.
    Greco KE; Nail LM; Kendall J; Cartwright J; Messecar DC
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Sep; 42(3):348-56. PubMed ID: 20738746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Analyzing factors associated with women's attitudes and behaviors toward screening mammography using design-based logistic regression.
    Madadi M; Zhang S; Yeary KH; Henderson LM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Feb; 144(1):193-204. PubMed ID: 24510010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Specialty differences and the ordering of screening mammography by primary care physicians.
    Taplin SH; Taylor V; Montano D; Chinn R; Urban N
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1994; 7(5):375-86. PubMed ID: 7810354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Miglioretti DL; Quale C; Rosenberg RD; Cutter G; Geller B; Bacchetti P; Sickles EA; Kerlikowske K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 15741572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The gynecologist's role in mammography screening in absence of a public health program.
    Chamot E; Perneger TV
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 268(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12768296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey.
    Yabroff KR; Breen N; Vernon SW; Meissner HI; Freedman AN; Ballard-Barbash R
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 May; 13(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 15159302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
    Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Factors associated with breast screening radiologists' annual mammogram reading volume in Italy.
    Morrone D; Giordano L; Artuso F; Bernardi D; Fedato C; Frigerio A; Giorgi D; Naldoni C; Saguatti G; Severi D; Taffurelli M; Terribile D; Ventura L; Bucchi L
    Radiol Med; 2016 Jul; 121(7):557-63. PubMed ID: 27033475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.