181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11131789)
1. Associative changes with a random CS-US relationship.
Rescorla RA
Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Nov; 53(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 11131789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of an extinguished CS on competition with another CS.
Bills CH; Dopheide M; Pineño O; Schachtman TR
Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 16457968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A role for CS-US contingency in Pavlovian conditioning.
Murphy RA; Baker AG
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jul; 30(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 15279513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response rates track the history of reinforcement times.
Harris JA; Gharaei S; Pincham HL
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jul; 37(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 21500934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Overshadowing of subsequent events and recovery thereafter.
Burger DC; Mallemat H; Miller RR
Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):149-71. PubMed ID: 10881606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Posttraining shifts in the overshadowing stimulus-unconditioned stimulus interval alleviates the overshadowing deficit.
Blaisdell AP; Denniston JC; Miller RR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Jan; 25(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 9987855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The comparator hypothesis of conditioned response generation: manifest conditioned excitation and inhibition as a function of relative excitatory strengths of CS and conditioning context at the time of testing.
Kasprow WJ; Schachtman TR; Miller RR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Oct; 13(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 3668477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning.
Harris JA; Andrew BJ; Kwok DW
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 23421397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of blocking and conditioned inhibition to a CS signaling a decrease in US intensity.
Wagner AR; Mazur JE; Donegan NH; Pfautz PL
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Oct; 6(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 7430953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Associative effects of US preexposure: modulation of conditioned responding by an excitatory training context.
Matzel LD; Brown AM; Miller RR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Jan; 13(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 3819652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learned irrelevance is not the sum of exposure to CS and US.
Bennett CH; Maldonado A; Mackintosh NJ
Q J Exp Psychol B; 1995 May; 48(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 7597194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Duration of signals for intertrial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in random control procedures.
Cooper LD; Aronson L; Balsam PD; Gibbon J
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 2303790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Motivational control of second-order conditioning.
Winterbauer NE; Balleine BW
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 16045387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CS-US interval as a determinant of the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responses.
Holland PC
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Apr; 6(2):155-74. PubMed ID: 7373230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Timing during inhibitory conditioning.
Williams DA; Johns KW; Brindas M
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 18426306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus.
Lovibond PF
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Jul; 9(3):225-47. PubMed ID: 6153052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanisms underlying retarded emergence of conditioned responding following inhibitory training: evidence for the comparator hypothesis.
Schachtman TR; Brown AM; Gordon EL; Catterson DA; Miller RR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Jul; 13(3):310-22. PubMed ID: 3612027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevention of the degraded-contingency effect by signalling training trials.
Gunther LM; Miller RR
Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):97-119. PubMed ID: 10881603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of changing the unconditioned stimulus on appetitive blocking.
Ganesan R; Pearce JM
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Jul; 14(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 3404082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of contextual associations in producing the partial reinforcement acquisition deficit.
Miguez G; Witnauer JE; Miller RR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 21707201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
