These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11131970)

  • 1. Simple knowledge-based descriptors to predict protein-ligand interactions. methodology and validation.
    Nissink JWM ; Verdonk ML; Klebe G
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2000 Nov; 14(8):787-803. PubMed ID: 11131970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SuperStar: improved knowledge-based interaction fields for protein binding sites.
    Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Watson P; Gillet V; Willett P
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(3):841-59. PubMed ID: 11273705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SuperStar: comparison of CSD and PDB-based interaction fields as a basis for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions.
    Boer DR; Kroon J; Cole JC; Smith B; Verdonk ML
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Sep; 312(1):275-87. PubMed ID: 11545602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SuperStar: a knowledge-based approach for identifying interaction sites in proteins.
    Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Taylor R
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Jun; 289(4):1093-108. PubMed ID: 10369784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of new hydrogen-bond descriptors and their application to comparative molecular field analyses.
    Böhm M; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 2002 Apr; 45(8):1585-97. PubMed ID: 11931613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of composite crystal-field environments in molecular recognition and the de novo design of protein ligands.
    Klebe G
    J Mol Biol; 1994 Mar; 237(2):212-35. PubMed ID: 8126735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binding affinity prediction for protein-ligand complexes based on β contacts and B factor.
    Liu Q; Kwoh CK; Li J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3076-85. PubMed ID: 24191692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Definition and display of steric, hydrophobic, and hydrogen-bonding properties of ligand binding sites in proteins using Lee and Richards accessible surface: validation of a high-resolution graphical tool for drug design.
    Bohacek RS; McMartin C
    J Med Chem; 1992 May; 35(10):1671-84. PubMed ID: 1588550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Descriptor Data Bank (DDB): A Cloud Platform for Multiperspective Modeling of Protein-Ligand Interactions.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):134-147. PubMed ID: 29186950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polypharmacology rescored: protein-ligand interaction profiles for remote binding site similarity assessment.
    Salentin S; Haupt VJ; Daminelli S; Schroeder M
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2014; 116(2-3):174-86. PubMed ID: 24923864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined use of physicochemical data and small-molecule crystallographic contact propensities to predict interactions in protein binding sites.
    Nissink JW; Taylor R
    Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov; 2(22):3238-49. PubMed ID: 15534701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A fragment library based on Gaussian mixtures predicting favorable molecular interactions.
    Rantanen VV; Denessiouk KA; Gyllenberg M; Koski T; Johnson MS
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Oct; 313(1):197-214. PubMed ID: 11601856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An automated method for predicting the positions of hydrogen-bonding atoms in binding sites.
    Mills JE; Perkins TD; Dean PM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1997 May; 11(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 9263850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AutoSite: an automated approach for pseudo-ligands prediction-from ligand-binding sites identification to predicting key ligand atoms.
    Ravindranath PA; Sanner MF
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 32(20):3142-3149. PubMed ID: 27354702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Encoding protein-ligand interaction patterns in fingerprints and graphs.
    Desaphy J; Raimbaud E; Ducrot P; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):623-37. PubMed ID: 23432543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PocketPicker: analysis of ligand binding-sites with shape descriptors.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Schneider G
    Chem Cent J; 2007 Mar; 1():7. PubMed ID: 17880740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated prediction of ligand-binding sites in proteins.
    Harris R; Olson AJ; Goodsell DS
    Proteins; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1506-17. PubMed ID: 17910060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction.
    Nissink JW; Murray C; Hartshorn M; Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Taylor R
    Proteins; 2002 Dec; 49(4):457-71. PubMed ID: 12402356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel method for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction and the related descriptors exploration.
    Li S; Xi L; Wang C; Li J; Lei B; Liu H; Yao X
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(6):900-9. PubMed ID: 18785151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
    Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.