157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11132284)
1. The skeletal response to matt and polished cemented femoral stems.
Barker DS; Wang AW; Yeo MF; Nawana NS; Brumby SA; Pearcy MJ; Howie DW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Nov; 82(8):1182-8. PubMed ID: 11132284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between cement fatigue damage and implant surface finish in proximal femoral prostheses.
Lennon AB; McCormack BA; Prendergast PJ
Med Eng Phys; 2003 Dec; 25(10):833-41. PubMed ID: 14630471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polished Cemented Femoral Stems Have a Lower Rate of Revision Than Matt Finished Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 96,315 Cemented Femoral Stems.
Hoskins W; van Bavel D; Lorimer M; de Steiger RN
J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1472-1476. PubMed ID: 29310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
Norman TL; Thyagarajan G; Saligrama VC; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1325-33. PubMed ID: 11522312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic and histologic analysis of cemented double tapered femoral stems.
Brumby SA; Howie DW; Pearcy MJ; Wang AW; Nawana NS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):229-37. PubMed ID: 9917608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In-vitro characteristics of cemented titanium femoral stems with a smooth surface finish.
Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Kaneuji A; Matsumoto T; Nakamura T
J Orthop Sci; 2013 Jan; 18(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22945910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stem subsidence of polished and rough double-taper stems: in vitro mechanical effects on the cement-bone interface.
Kaneuji A; Yamada K; Hirosaki K; Takano M; Matsumoto T
Acta Orthop; 2009 Jun; 80(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 19421909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants.
Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ
J Biomech Eng; 2001 Dec; 123(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11783734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modelling debonded stem-cement interface for hip implants: effect of residual stresses.
Nuño N; Amabili M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Jan; 17(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11779645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modelling the fibrous tissue layer in cemented hip replacements: experimental and finite element methods.
Waide V; Cristofolini L; Stolk J; Verdonschot N; Boogaard GJ; Toni A
J Biomech; 2004 Jan; 37(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 14672564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of femoral neck length, stem size, and body weight on strains in the proximal cement mantle.
Harrington MA; O'Connor DO; Lozynsky AJ; Kovach I; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 11940617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Huiskes R; Verdonschot N; Nivbrant B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):103-12. PubMed ID: 9917595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subsidence of THA stems due to acrylic cement creep is extremely sensitive to interface friction.
Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
J Biomech; 1996 Dec; 29(12):1569-75. PubMed ID: 8945655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial stability of fully and partially cemented femoral stems.
Claes L; Fiedler S; Ohnmacht M; Duda GN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2000 Dec; 15(10):750-5. PubMed ID: 11050357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding.
Verdonschot N; Tanck E; Huiskes R
J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Dec; 42(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 9827679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length.
Chang PB; Mann KA; Bartel DL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):57-69. PubMed ID: 9917591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of total hip arthroplasty cemented femoral stem surface finish, collar and cement thickness on load transfer to the femur.
Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Morrison BJ; Dorr LD
J Appl Biomater Biomech; 2003; 1(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 20803475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
