These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11132284)

  • 21. Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    Biomaterials; 1998 Oct; 19(19):1773-9. PubMed ID: 9856588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The fixation of the cemented femoral component. Effects of stem stiffness, cement thickness and roughness of the cement-bone surface.
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Leyvraz PF
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Mar; 82(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 10755444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of dorsal flanges on fixation of a cemented total hip replacement femoral stem.
    Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 15069149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 Jul; 79(4):665-9. PubMed ID: 9250762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Axisymmetric finite element analysis of a debonded total hip stem with an unsupported distal tip.
    Norman TL; Saligrama VC; Hustosky KT; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech Eng; 1996 Aug; 118(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 8872263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using 'subcement' to simulate the long-term fatigue response of cemented femoral stems in a cadaver model: could a novel preclinical screening test have caught the Exeter matt problem?
    Race A; Miller MA; Mann KA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(4):585-97. PubMed ID: 20476506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Periprosthetic fractures around polished collarless cemented stems: the effect of stem design on fracture pattern.
    Erhardt JB; Khoo PP; Stoffel KK; Yates PJ
    Hip Int; 2013; 23(5):459-64. PubMed ID: 23813164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density.
    Lewis G; Duggineni R
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Initial stability of cemented femoral stems as a function of surface finish, collar, and stem size.
    Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 14711952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
    Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of the stem fixation scenario on load transfer in a hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a biomimetic stem.
    Caouette C; Bureau MN; Vendittoli PA; Lavigne M; Nuño N
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 May; 45():90-100. PubMed ID: 25688031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Micromechanics of postmortem-retrieved cement-bone interfaces.
    Miller MA; Eberhardt AW; Cleary RJ; Verdonschot N; Mann KA
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Feb; 28(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 19658167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface finish mechanics explain different clinical survivorship of cemented femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty.
    Beksac B; Taveras NA; Valle AG; Salvati EA
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(6):407-22. PubMed ID: 17956208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative in vitro study on the long term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs.
    Cristofolini L; Teutonico AS; Monti L; Cappello A; Toni A
    J Biomech; 2003 Nov; 36(11):1603-15. PubMed ID: 14522201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bone creep and short and long term subsidence after cemented stem total hip arthroplasty (THA).
    Norman TL; Shultz T; Noble G; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech; 2013 Mar; 46(5):949-55. PubMed ID: 23357700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of design changes on cemented tapered femoral stem fixation.
    Middleton RG; Howie DW; Costi K; Sharpe P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):47-56. PubMed ID: 9917590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of proximal stem geometry and surface finish on the fixation of a double-tapered cemented femoral stem.
    Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20828697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors affecting cement strains near the tip of a cemented femoral component.
    Estok DM; Orr TE; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jan; 12(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 9021500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.