These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11132809)

  • 1. Fleet study evaluation of an advance brake warning system.
    Shinar D
    Hum Factors; 2000; 42(3):482-9. PubMed ID: 11132809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preventing passenger vehicle occupant injuries by vehicle design--a historical perspective from IIHS.
    O'Neill B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Apr; 10(2):113-26. PubMed ID: 19333823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IIHS side crash test ratings and occupant death risk in real-world crashes.
    Teoh ER; Lund AK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Oct; 12(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 21972861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure.
    Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 15003590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
    Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real-world effects of rear cross-traffic alert on police-reported backing crashes.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():350-355. PubMed ID: 30580146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing rear-end collision risk of cars and heavy vehicles on freeways using a surrogate safety measure.
    Zhao P; Lee C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():149-158. PubMed ID: 29407662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is passenger vehicle incompatibility still a problem?
    Teoh ER; Nolan JM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(6):585-91. PubMed ID: 23137089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-world effects of rear automatic braking and other backing assistance systems.
    Cicchino JB
    J Safety Res; 2019 Feb; 68():41-47. PubMed ID: 30876519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of a low-speed automatic brake system estimated from real life data.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
    Ann Adv Automot Med; 2012; 56():231-40. PubMed ID: 23169133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of vehicle incompatibility on child occupant injury risk.
    Kallan MJ; Arbogast KB; Durbin DR
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2005; 49():279-92. PubMed ID: 16179154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Narrative text analysis to identify technologies to prevent motor vehicle crashes: examples from military vehicles.
    Pollack KM; Yee N; Canham-Chervak M; Rossen L; Bachynski KE; Baker SP
    J Safety Res; 2013 Feb; 44():45-9. PubMed ID: 23398704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crash fatality and vehicle incompatibility in collisions between cars and light trucks or vans.
    Ossiander EM; Koepsell TD; McKnight B
    Inj Prev; 2014 Dec; 20(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 24835235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost and benefit estimates of partially-automated vehicle collision avoidance technologies.
    Harper CD; Hendrickson CT; Samaras C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):104-15. PubMed ID: 27423430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of rear-end crash potential and driver contributing factors based on car-following driving simulation.
    Bumrungsup L; Kanitpong K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(5):296-301. PubMed ID: 35522546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of daytime running lights on crashes between two vehicles in Saskatchewan: a study of a government fleet.
    Sparks GA; Neudorf RD; Smith AE; Wapman KR; Zador PL
    Accid Anal Prev; 1993 Oct; 25(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 8397664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.