BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11133194)

  • 1. Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test.
    Dolphin K; Belshaw R; Orme CD; Quicke DL
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Dec; 17(3):401-6. PubMed ID: 11133194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correcting the problem of false incongruence due to noise imbalance in the incongruence length difference (ILD) test.
    Quicke DL; Jones OR; Epstein DR
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):496-503. PubMed ID: 17562473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting phylogenetic incongruence using BIONJ: an improvement of the ILD test.
    Zelwer M; Daubin V
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Dec; 33(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 15522796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When does the incongruence length difference test fail?
    Darlu P; Lecointre G
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 11919284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incongruence of mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees in the Carabid beetles Ohomopterus.
    Sota T; Vogler AP
    Syst Biol; 2001 Feb; 50(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 12116593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. mILD: a tool for constructing and analyzing matrices of pairwise phylogenetic character incongruence tests.
    Planet PJ; Sarkar IN
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(24):4423-4. PubMed ID: 16267088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tree disagreement: measuring and testing incongruence in phylogenies.
    Planet PJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Feb; 39(1):86-102. PubMed ID: 16243006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phylogeny of Eunicida (Annelida) and exploring data congruence using a partition addition bootstrap alteration (PABA) approach.
    Struck TH; Purschke G; Halanych KM
    Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 16507520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing substitution models within a phylogenetic tree.
    Weiss G; von Haeseler A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Apr; 20(4):572-8. PubMed ID: 12679552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inferring trees.
    Whelan S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 452():287-309. PubMed ID: 18566770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy--the behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses.
    Dowton M; Austin AD
    Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 11943090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method to localize and test the significance of incongruence: detecting domain shuffling in the nuclear receptor superfamily.
    Thornton JW; DeSalle R
    Syst Biol; 2000 Jun; 49(2):183-201. PubMed ID: 12118404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using data-display networks for exploratory data analysis in phylogenetic studies.
    Morrison DA
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):1044-57. PubMed ID: 20034996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partial combination applied to phylogeny of European cyprinids using the mitochondrial control region.
    Gilles A; Lecointre G; Miquelis A; Loerstcher M; Chappaz R; Brun G
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2001 Apr; 19(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 11286488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sources of incongruence among mammalian mitochondrial sequences: COII, COIII, and ND6 genes are main contributors.
    Shevchuk NA; Allard MW
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2001 Oct; 21(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 11603936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phylogenetic mixtures on a single tree can mimic a tree of another topology.
    Matsen FA; Steel M
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):767-75. PubMed ID: 17886146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vestige: maximum likelihood phylogenetic footprinting.
    Wakefield MJ; Maxwell P; Huttley GA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 6():130. PubMed ID: 15921531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions.
    Liu L; Pearl DK
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):504-14. PubMed ID: 17562474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies.
    Pisani D; Benton MJ; Wilkinson M
    Acta Biotheor; 2007; 55(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17657570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.