100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11133194)
41. Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence: a model.
Meng C; Kubatko LS
Theor Popul Biol; 2009 Feb; 75(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 19038278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. An information-theoretic method for the treatment of plural ancestry in phylogenetics.
Munshaw S; Kepler TB
Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Jun; 25(6):1199-208. PubMed ID: 18359947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The performance of the Congruence Among Distance Matrices (CADM) test in phylogenetic analysis.
Campbell V; Legendre P; Lapointe FJ
BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 11():64. PubMed ID: 21388552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Incongruence between cladistic and taxonomic systems.
Grant V
Am J Bot; 2003 Sep; 90(9):1263-70. PubMed ID: 21659226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined?
Cunningham CW
Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Jul; 14(7):733-40. PubMed ID: 9214746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. ["Long-branch Attraction" artifact in phylogenetic reconstruction].
Li YW; Yu L; Zhang YP
Yi Chuan; 2007 Jun; 29(6):659-67. PubMed ID: 17650481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Introduction. Statistical and computational challenges in molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
Goldman N; Yang Z
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):3889-92. PubMed ID: 18852095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Running
Sharma PP; Vahtera V; Kawauchi GY; Giribet G
Cladistics; 2011 Oct; 27(5):538-549. PubMed ID: 34875797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Measuring Topological Congruence by Extending Character Techniques.
Wheeler W
Cladistics; 1999 Jun; 15(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 34902910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test.
Hipp AL; Hall JC; Sytsma KJ
Syst Biol; 2004 Feb; 53(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 14965902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The utility of the incongruence length difference test.
Barker FK; Lutzoni FM
Syst Biol; 2002 Aug; 51(4):625-37. PubMed ID: 12228004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Strongest Evidence Revisited.
Salisbury BA
Cladistics; 2000 Dec; 16(4):394-402. PubMed ID: 34902903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Gender Incongruence: A Progressive Approach for Transition.
Kadam D
Indian J Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 55(2):127-128. PubMed ID: 36017413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. CLADISTICS AND EVOLUTIONARY MODELS.
Nelson G
Cladistics; 1989 Sep; 5(3):275-289. PubMed ID: 34933460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Cladistics in action.
Fink WL
Science; 1982 May; 216(4548):872-3. PubMed ID: 17819166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Craniodental and Postcranial Characters of Non-Avian Dinosauria Often Imply Different Trees.
Li Y; Ruta M; Wills MA
Syst Biol; 2020 Jul; 69(4):638-659. PubMed ID: 31769837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Geography shapes the phylogeny of frailejones (Espeletiinae Cuatrec., Asteraceae): a remarkable example of recent rapid radiation in sky islands.
Diazgranados M; Barber JC
PeerJ; 2017; 5():e2968. PubMed ID: 28168124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Molecular phylogenetics, seed morphometrics, chromosome number evolution and systematics of European
Sramkó G; Molnár V A; Tóth JP; Laczkó L; Kalinka A; Horváth O; Skuza L; Lukács BA; Popiela A
PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2800. PubMed ID: 28028470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Dental Data Perform Relatively Poorly in Reconstructing Mammal Phylogenies: Morphological Partitions Evaluated with Molecular Benchmarks.
Sansom RS; Wills MA; Williams T
Syst Biol; 2017 Sep; 66(5):813-822. PubMed ID: 28003534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Progress, pitfalls and parallel universes: a history of insect phylogenetics.
Kjer KM; Simon C; Yavorskaya M; Beutel RG
J R Soc Interface; 2016 Aug; 13(121):. PubMed ID: 27558853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
