BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11135464)

  • 1. Cervical screening behavior of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS).
    Bucchi L; Zani J; Pierri C; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Folicaldi S; Cortecchia S; Bondi A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Jan; 24(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 11135464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL on Pap smear reports: management by repeat Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, or colposcopy?
    Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Borgatta L; Buck H; Kramer L; Rubin R
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 9487318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.
    Manos MM; Kinney WK; Hurley LB; Sherman ME; Shieh-Ngai J; Kurman RJ; Ransley JE; Fetterman BJ; Hartinger JS; McIntosh KM; Pawlick GF; Hiatt RA
    JAMA; 1999 May; 281(17):1605-10. PubMed ID: 10235153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's triage and management preferences for cervical cytologic reports demonstrating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Ferris DG; Kriegel D; Cote L; Litaker M; Woodward L
    Arch Fam Med; 1997; 6(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 9225706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of liquid-based cytology and Pap smear as a screening method for cervical cancer.
    Zhu J; Norman I; Elfgren K; Gaberi V; Hagmar B; Hjerpe A; Andersson S
    Oncol Rep; 2007 Jul; 18(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 17549362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two tests for detecting carcinogenic HPV in women with Papanicolaou smear reports of ASCUS and LSIL.
    Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Woodward L
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9487319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probability of early repeat Pap smear in an integrated cervical screening programme.
    Rosso A; Foglietta F; Naldoni C; Schincaglia P; Buzzi G; Camprincoli S; Serafini M; Busoli S; Leoni F; Grilli N; Bucchi L
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2000 Aug; 9(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 10958330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CIN 2/3 and cervical cancer after an ASCUS pap smear. A 7-year, prospective study of the Norwegian population-based, coordinated screening program.
    Nygård JF; Sauer T; Skjeldestad FE; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(6):991-1000. PubMed ID: 14674068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervicovaginal smear abnormalities in sexually active adolescents. Implications for management.
    Simsir A; Brooks S; Cochran L; Bourquin P; Ioffe OB
    Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 11917572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the interval between papanicolaou tests influence the quality of cytology?
    Jeronimo J; Khan MJ; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
    Cancer; 2005 Jun; 105(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 15822121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colposcopic and Histological Outcome of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance and Atypical Squamous Cell of Undetermined Significance Cannot Exclude High-Grade in Women Screened for Cervical Cancer.
    Ortashi O; Abdalla D
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Sep; 20(9):2579-2582. PubMed ID: 31554348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance indicators of organized cervical screening in Romagna (Italy).
    Bucchi L; Falcini F; Schincaglia P; Desiderio F; Bondi A; Farneti M; Casadei Giunchi D; Serafini M; Canuti D; Caprara L; Sabbadini F; Monari F; Sassoli P
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2003 Jun; 12(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 12771561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
    Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
    Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical cancer screening with liquid cytology in women with developmental disabilities.
    Kavoussi SK; Smith YR; Ernst SD; Quint EH
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009; 18(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 19072727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oral contraceptive pills are associated with artifacts in ThinPrep Pap smears that mimic low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Morrison C; Prokorym P; Piquero C; Wakely PE; Nuovo GJ
    Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 12704686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patients with epithelial cell abnormality in PAP smears: correlation of results with follow-up smears and cervical biopsies.
    Türkmen IÇ; Başsüllü N; Korkmaz P; Günenç B; Baykal CM; Güdücü N; Işçı H; Dünder I; Doğusoy GB
    Turk Patoloji Derg; 2013; 29(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 24022307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a comparative review of original and automated rescreen diagnosis of cervicovaginal smears with long term follow-up.
    Stastny JF; Remmers RE; London WB; Pedigo MA; Cahill LA; Ryan M; Frable WJ
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 9438460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears.
    Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 11584480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, after six months delay: a three-year experience in an Iranian university hospital.
    Yarandi F; Shojaei H; Eftekhar Z; Izadi-Mood N
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 49(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 19432613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
    Kulasingam SL; Hughes JP; Kiviat NB; Mao C; Weiss NS; Kuypers JM; Koutsky LA
    JAMA; 2002 Oct; 288(14):1749-57. PubMed ID: 12365959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.