BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11135536)

  • 1. EPA re-evaluates StarLink license.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 11135536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risks of genetically engineered crops.
    Gurian-Sherman D
    Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. PubMed ID: 14512604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EPA biotech rule reviewed yet again.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 May; 17(5):415. PubMed ID: 10331783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biotechnology. EPA proposal would exempt some GMOs from registry.
    Reardon S
    Science; 2011 May; 332(6030):652. PubMed ID: 21551040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toxicology. Panel urges further study of biotech corn.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5498):1867. PubMed ID: 11187032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GMO roundup.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):5. PubMed ID: 11135516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tempest in a taco shell.
    Kluger J
    Time; 2000 Oct; 156(14):80. PubMed ID: 11183339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GM crop data-agronomy and ecology in tandem.
    Stewart CN; Wheaton SK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 11135511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FDA not yet moved by biotech food critics.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jan; 18(1):15. PubMed ID: 10625375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. US reflects on flying eye for transgenic crops.
    Knight J
    Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6954):112. PubMed ID: 12968141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National academy panel urges USDA to toughen reviews of transgenic plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):323-4. PubMed ID: 11923822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Summit leaders fail to bridge GM food split.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6794):335. PubMed ID: 10935605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. US sends mixed message in GM debate...as questions emerge over cost-effectiveness.
    Reichhardt T
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6742):298. PubMed ID: 10432097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No GM conspiracy.
    Burke D
    Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6754):640-1. PubMed ID: 10537098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Policy: Reboot the debate on genetic engineering.
    Kuzma J
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):165-7. PubMed ID: 26961641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EPA error risked halving India's rice harvest.
    Gopal ES
    Nature; 2000 Jan; 403(6766):130. PubMed ID: 10646574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Japan's GM corn will undergo tests.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6809):126. PubMed ID: 11089943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.