These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Editorial: The Boston-Edelin case. Kase N Conn Med; 1975 Jun; 39(6):366-7. PubMed ID: 1139931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Editorial: Commonwealth v. Edelin. Gibbs RF J Leg Med (N Y); 1975 Mar; 3(3):6. PubMed ID: 1095673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of the Edelin case. Holzer JF Hosp Prog; 1975 Apr; 56(4):20-1. PubMed ID: 1123228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. After Edelin: little guidance. Robertson JA Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Jun; 7(3):15-7, 45. PubMed ID: 873772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Edelin decision revisited: a survey of the reactions of Connecticut's OB/GYNs. Affleck G; Thomas A Conn Med; 1977 Oct; 41(10):637-40. PubMed ID: 913095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An evangelical looks at the abortion phenomenon. Brown HO America (NY); 1976 Sep; 135(8):161-4. PubMed ID: 11664725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Social abortion and medical paternalism. Bannon A; O'Donnell A Hum Life Rev; 1983; 9(1):93-107. PubMed ID: 11655582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion in the American context. Noonan JT Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 11662324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a new analysis of the abortion debate. Bell KL Ariz Law Rev; 1991; 33(4):907-35. PubMed ID: 11656167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. How to argue about abortion: continuing the discussion. Burtchaell JT Christ Crisis; 1977 Dec; 37(21):313-6. PubMed ID: 11663816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion, personhood, and privacy in Texas. Johnson A Tex Law Rev; 1990 Jun; 68(7):1521-44. PubMed ID: 11656019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. To whom does the child belong? Stone AA; Greenblatt M; Ewalt J; Curran W Semin Psychiatry; 1970 Aug; 2(3):231-45. PubMed ID: 5527393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The struggle against abortion: why the use of lethal force is not morally justifiable. Southern Baptist Convention. Christian Life Commission Ethics Med; 1995; 11(2):26-32. PubMed ID: 11660188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]