These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11138687)

  • 1. Different approaches to bone densitometry.
    Fogelman I; Blake GM
    J Nucl Med; 2000 Dec; 41(12):2015-25. PubMed ID: 11138687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone mass measurement: how, where, when and why?
    Delmas PD
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1993; 38 Suppl 2():70-6. PubMed ID: 8252108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone densitometry: patients with end-stage renal disease.
    Erlichman M; Holohan TV
    Health Technol Assess (Rockv); 1996 Mar; (8):1-27. PubMed ID: 8722234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peripheral bone densitometry: an old friend revisited.
    Kleerekoper M; Nelson DA
    Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc; 1998; 109():62-70; discussion 70-2. PubMed ID: 9601128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applications of bone densitometry for osteoporosis.
    Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am; 1998 Jun; 27(2):267-88. PubMed ID: 9669138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone densitometry and the diagnosis of osteoporosis.
    Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Semin Nucl Med; 2001 Jan; 31(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 11200207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone mineral density evaluation in osteoporosis: why yes and why not?
    Celi M; Rao C; Scialdoni A; Tempesta V; Gasbarra E; Pistillo P; Tarantino U
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2013 Oct; 25 Suppl 1():S47-9. PubMed ID: 24046042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone densitometry: an update.
    Shagam JY
    Radiol Technol; 2003; 74(4):321-38; quiz 339-41, 351. PubMed ID: 12690806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Osteoporosis by forearm bone densitometry in postmenopausal women in West Virginia.
    Pfister AK; Welch CA; Saville PD; Ratiff HL
    W V Med J; 2007; 103(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 17432313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures.
    Siris ES; Chen YT; Abbott TA; Barrett-Connor E; Miller PD; Wehren LE; Berger ML
    Arch Intern Med; 2004 May; 164(10):1108-12. PubMed ID: 15159268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative ultrasound or clinical risk factors--which best identifies women at risk of osteoporosis?
    Stewart A; Reid DM
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 73(866):165-71. PubMed ID: 10884730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnosis of osteoporosis in clinical practice.
    Kröger H; Reeve J
    Ann Med; 1998 Jun; 30(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 9677014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of cortical porosity of the proximal femur improves identification of women with nonvertebral fragility fractures.
    Ahmed LA; Shigdel R; Joakimsen RM; Eldevik OP; Eriksen EF; Ghasem-Zadeh A; Bala Y; Zebaze R; Seeman E; Bjørnerem Å
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Aug; 26(8):2137-46. PubMed ID: 25876879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone densitometry as an adjunct to GnRH agonist therapy.
    Cann CE
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Mar; 43(3 Suppl):321-30. PubMed ID: 9564668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with proximal femoral fractures--comparative study between quantitative ultrasonometry and gold standard DXA].
    Schnabel M; Eser G; Ziller V; Mann D; Mann E; Hadji P
    Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Oct; 130(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 16220445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advantages of peripheral radiogrametry over dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine in the assessment of prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in women.
    Meema HE; Meindok H
    J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Aug; 7(8):897-903. PubMed ID: 1442203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A comparison between quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy densitometry in the study of patients at risk for postmenopausal osteoporosis].
    La Fianza A; Campani R; Dore R; Torretta L; Bertoni G
    Radiol Med; 1992; 84(1-2):11-4. PubMed ID: 1509125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Bone mineral density measurement techniques].
    Ibáñez R
    An Sist Sanit Navar; 2003; 26 Suppl 3():19-27. PubMed ID: 14716356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to predict need for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in postmenopausal women.
    Chao AS; Chen FP; Lin YC; Huang TS; Fan CM; Yu YW
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 54(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 26700992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The spine deformity index in osteoporosis is not related to bone mineral and ultrasound measurements.
    Bernecker P; Pietschmann P; Winkelbauer F; Krexner E; Resch H; Willvonseder R
    Br J Radiol; 1992 May; 65(773):393-6. PubMed ID: 1611418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.