These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11139558)

  • 1. Reversal of asymptomatic cervical length shortening with cervical cerclage: a preliminary study.
    O'Connell MP; Lindow SW
    Hum Reprod; 2001 Jan; 16(1):172-173. PubMed ID: 11139558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical cerclage in the second trimester of pregnancy: a historical cohort study.
    Novy MJ; Gupta A; Wothe DD; Gupta S; Kennedy KA; Gravett MG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1447-54; discussion 1454-6. PubMed ID: 11408867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tightening McDonald cerclage suture under sonographic guidance.
    Hershkovitz R; Burstein E; Pinku A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 31(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 17935263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage: outcome depends on preoperative cervical length and presence of visible membranes at time of cerclage.
    Groom KM; Shennan AH; Bennett PR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 187(2):445-9. PubMed ID: 12193941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transvaginal sonographic examination of the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women: review of the literature.
    Rozenberg P; Gillet A; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):302-11. PubMed ID: 11896957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of cervical cerclage on rate of cervical shortening.
    Drassinower D; Vink J; Pessel C; Vani K; Brubaker SG; Zork N; Ananth CV
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 46(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 25652890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester: why cerclage therapy may not help.
    Rust OA; Atlas RO; Reed J; van Gaalen J; Balducci J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Nov; 185(5):1098-105. PubMed ID: 11717641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: the value of Shirodkar suture for the short cervix.
    Heath VC; Souka AP; Erasmus I; Gibb DM; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 12(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 9819869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): study design and preliminary results.
    Althuisius SM; Dekker GA; van Geijn HP; Bekedam DJ; Hummel P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):823-9. PubMed ID: 11035320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Early prophylactic cervical cerclage for hypoplastic cervix following exposure to DES in utero].
    Raynal P; Le Meaux JP; Epelboin S; Tournaire M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2005 Oct; 34(6):572-80. PubMed ID: 16208200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does cervical cerclage prevent preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix?
    Hassan SS; Romero R; Maymon E; Berry SM; Blackwell SC; Treadwell MC; Tomlinson M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1325-9; discussion 1329-31. PubMed ID: 11408848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sonographic evaluation of cervical length in pregnancy: diagnosis and management of preterm cervical effacement in patients at risk for premature delivery.
    Ayers JW; DeGrood RM; Compton AA; Barclay M; Ansbacher R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jun; 71(6 Pt 1):939-44. PubMed ID: 3285274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controversies regarding cervical incompetence, short cervix, and the need for cerclage.
    Althuisius S; Dekker G
    Clin Perinatol; 2004 Dec; 31(4):695-720, v-vi. PubMed ID: 15519424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients with prior second-trimester loss: prophylactic cerclage or serial transvaginal sonograms?
    Berghella V; Haas S; Chervoneva I; Hyslop T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 187(3):747-51. PubMed ID: 12237658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in triplets.
    Moragianni VA; Cohen JD; Smith SJ; Rosenn MF; Craparo FJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 19565536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anterior uterocervical angle measurement improves prediction of cerclage failure.
    Knight JC; Tenbrink E; Sheng J; Patil AS
    J Perinatol; 2017 Apr; 37(4):375-379. PubMed ID: 28055026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os.
    Rust OA; Atlas RO; Jones KJ; Benham BN; Balducci J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 11035321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of cervical cerclage on cervical length and the impact of changes in cervical length on pregnancy prognosis.
    Herbst SSR; Peixoto AB; Araujo Júnior E; Moron AF; Mattar R
    Ceska Gynekol; 2018; 83(5):341-347. PubMed ID: 30848137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biweekly ultrasound assessment of cervical shortening in triplet pregnancies and the effect of cerclage placement.
    Moragianni VA; Aronis KN; Craparo FJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 37(5):617-8. PubMed ID: 21154786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emergency cervical cerclage: a retrospective review of 51 cases.
    Wong GP; Farquharson DF; Dansereau J
    Am J Perinatol; 1993 Sep; 10(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 8240589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.