178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11140204)
1. The pros and cons of data analysis software for qualitative research.
St John W; Johnson P
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2000; 32(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 11140204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of computer software in the analysis of qualitative data: efficient clerk, research assistant or Trojan horse?
Morison M; Moir J
J Adv Nurs; 1998 Jul; 28(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 9687137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysing qualitative data: computerized and other approaches.
Webb C
J Adv Nurs; 1999 Feb; 29(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 10197931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Data Analysis Software in Qualitative Research: Preconceptions, Expectations, and Adoption.
Cypress BS
Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2019; 38(4):213-220. PubMed ID: 31145168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of qualitative research.
Horsburgh D
J Clin Nurs; 2003 Mar; 12(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 12603565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Issues for consideration when choosing a qualitative data management system.
Russell CK; Gregory DM
J Adv Nurs; 1993 Nov; 18(11):1806-16. PubMed ID: 8288827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software.
Cope DG
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2014 May; 41(3):322-3. PubMed ID: 24769596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Implication of Using NVivo Software in Qualitative Data Analysis: Evidence-Based Reflections.
Zamawe FC
Malawi Med J; 2015 Mar; 27(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 26137192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software: a review.
Banner DJ; Albarrran JW
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(3):24-31. PubMed ID: 19694114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analyzing qualitative data with computer software.
Weitzman EA
Health Serv Res; 1999 Dec; 34(5 Pt 2):1241-63. PubMed ID: 10591282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of webQDA software on qualitative nursing research: an experience report.
Machado ALG; Vieira NFC
Rev Bras Enferm; 2020; 73(3):e20180411. PubMed ID: 32267413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Further assessment of a method to estimate reliability and validity of qualitative research findings.
Hinds PS; Scandrett-Hibden S; McAulay LS
J Adv Nurs; 1990 Apr; 15(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 2341688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The evaluation of qualitative research published in nursing journals: protocol of a cross-sectional study].
Guarinoni MG; Storti M; Dignani L; Motta PC
Prof Inferm; 2018; 71(3):173-177. PubMed ID: 30457271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating quality of measuring tools: reliability and validity.
Rice VH
Cardiovasc Nurs; 1988; 24(6):47-8. PubMed ID: 3203359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research.
Porter S
J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 17824942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Researcher's Workbench.
Graves JR; Fu LS
Comput Nurs; 1991; 9(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 2059895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Keeping nurse researchers safe: workplace health and safety issues.
Barr J; Welch A
J Adv Nurs; 2012 Jul; 68(7):1538-45. PubMed ID: 22309294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysing qualitative research data using computer software.
McLafferty E; Farley AH
Nurs Times; 2006 Jun 13-19; 102(24):34-6. PubMed ID: 16827047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reflexivity: a critical issue in qualitative research].
de la Cuesta-Benjumea C
Enferm Clin; 2011; 21(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 21531602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standards for qualitative research.
Burns N
Nurs Sci Q; 1989; 2(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 2927791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
