These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11141009)

  • 1. Recognition of monosyllabic words by cochlear implant patients and by normal-hearing subjects listening to words processed through cochlear implant signal processing strategies.
    Dorman MF; Loizou PC; Fitzke J; Tu Z
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():64-6. PubMed ID: 11141009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word recognition by children listening to speech processed into a small number of channels: data from normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants.
    Dorman MF; Loizou PC; Kemp LL; Kirk KI
    Ear Hear; 2000 Dec; 21(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 11132785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unilateral Hearing Loss: Understanding Speech Recognition and Localization Variability-Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
    Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):159-173. PubMed ID: 28067750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of gender on the hearing performance of adult cochlear implant patients.
    Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T
    Laryngoscope; 2012 May; 122(5):1126-9. PubMed ID: 22374914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A daily alternating method for comparing different signal-processing strategies in hearing aids and in cochlear implants.
    Tyler RS; Witt SA; Dunn CC; Perreau AE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 May; 19(5):443-54. PubMed ID: 19253815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [How does a cochlear implant speech processor work?].
    Adunka O; Kiefer J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Nov; 84(11):841-50; quiz 851-4. PubMed ID: 16358193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced hearing in noise for cochlear implant recipients: clinical trial results for a commercially available speech-enhancement strategy.
    Koch DB; Quick A; Osberger MJ; Saoji A; Litvak L
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jun; 35(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 24691504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of speak-type cochlear implant signal processors.
    Loizou PC; Dorman MF; Tu Z; Fitzke J
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():67-8. PubMed ID: 11141010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum preimplantation monosyllabic score as predictor of cochlear implant outcome.
    Hoppe U; Hocke T; Hast A; Iro H
    HNO; 2019 Jun; 67(Suppl 2):62-68. PubMed ID: 30944946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Everyday Listening Performance of Children Before and After Receiving a Second Cochlear Implant: Results Using the Parent Version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.
    Galvin KL; Mok M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 26418045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults with unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants or normal hearing.
    Hughes KC; Galvin KL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):121-9. PubMed ID: 23540588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of continuous interleaved sampling and simultaneous analog stimulation speech processing strategies in newly implanted adults with a Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
    Zwolan TA; Kileny PR; Smith S; Waltzman S; Chute P; Domico E; Firszt J; Hodges A; Mills D; Whearty M; Osberger MJ; Fisher L
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 May; 26(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 15891649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monosyllable speech perception of Japanese hearing aid users with prelingual hearing loss: implications for surgical indication of cochlear implant.
    Fukuda S; Fukushima K; Toida N; Tsukamura K; Maeda Y; Kibayashi N; Nagayasu R; Orita Y; Kasai N; Kataoka Y; Nishizaki K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Oct; 67(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 14550959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential recruitment of the speech processing system in healthy subjects and rehabilitated cochlear implant patients.
    Giraud AL; Truy E; Frackowiak RS; Grégoire MC; Pujol JF; Collet L
    Brain; 2000 Jul; 123 ( Pt 7)():1391-402. PubMed ID: 10869051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.